Featured Articles
Announcing Pi
Technical Specifications
Raspberry Pi FAQs
Win a Pi
Raspberry Pi Wishlist
Actions
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 706 subscribers
  • Views 857 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

2013, the year of ARM Linux on the desktop?

morgaine

Very belatedly, may all of you at Element 14, staff and group members alike, have a

 

Very Happy New Year. image

 

I haven't been able to participate here for 3 weeks or so owing to festive tie ups, very interested in catchng up with recent events.  I have the feeling that 2013 is going to be a year to remember in the ARM Linux space.  The Raspberry Pi shook up the entire sector in 2012 with its price point and its popularity, and undoubtedly the other ARM licensees are not going to sit by passively while only one company gets all the popular exposure.  Freescale's recent release of i.MX6 is sure to be followed by TI and Samsung and ST and many others with similar devices, encouraged by the public's huge apetite for tablets, smartphones and media devices.   My guess is that it's going to be an amazing year to watch on the ARM hardware front.

 

All the best to all of you!  Have a great 2013 !!! image

 

Morgaine.

 

PS. The title is a play on one of Slashdot's common memes .... "the year of Linux on the desktop", which seems to never arrive.  But with "ARM" added in there, it just might!

Parents Reply Children
  • in reply to e14 Contributor

    @ coder27: some relevant point there, 'spesh from the Pi point of view.

     

    I think that one of the hurdles to the "ARM + Linux desktop" combo is convincing hardware manufacturers that Linux support is good for business.

     

    Bear in mind that I'm thinking of the concept of a desktop in a "consumer" sense - a box (not a board) that one purchases, unpacks, plugs in and it's (mostly) ready to go (bar the usual of getting it to talk to your home network and whatnot). Buying a box with no OS preinstalled would be a bar for many consumers, so doubtless most manufacturers will choose to ship their boxes with Android (because it's so ubiquitous), Most of our consumers would doubtless plod along with this without even realising that there are alternatives so to get Linux out there our box really needs to ship with Linux as well - and not just any old "fits where it touches" distro that will send our customer scurrying back to the familiarity of Android after five minutes, but something that provides a transparent interface between the customer, the applications that (s)he wants to run and the hardware that (s)he wishes to utilise.

     

    That's what an operating system is supposed to do, after all. For most people it's just a means to an end rather than an end in itself. I think it's easy for people like us who habitually poke about in the guts of computers to forget that. So the charitable manufacturer might choose to preinstall Ubuntu and will then brace itself for a wave of "why don't you support this or that distro?" questions.

     

    @ coder27: Whither Fedora: I don't think that they ever intend their product to be consumer level. It's alpha all the way and the page upon page of mailing list diatribe micro-analysing each meeting-about-the-previous-meeting that they produce in lieu of any kind of roadmap seems to bear this out. That's fine, someone has to do the cutting edge stuff, but it just feels like Fedora exists for it's own sake rather than to achieve any kind of stated goal. I don't think that provision of customer support or human readable documentation would be playing to their strengths either. [/soapbox]

     

    The Pi thing in general shows how essential proper manufacturer support is from the outset - aside from the odd wobbly driver and the failure to utilise existing hardware features (which is fair enough, considering what it was made for) I think it demonstrates that limited hardware needs a complementary OS. Perhaps when quadcore ARM missiles are commonplace it won't matter, but it would be a shame IMO if yet again we tossed processing power at sub-optimal software instead of taking the time to write it properly in the first place.

  • in reply to e14 Contributor

    Jonathan Garrish wrote:

     

    . Perhaps when quadcore ARM missiles are commonplace it won't matter, but it would be a shame IMO if yet again we tossed processing power at sub-optimal software instead of taking the time to write it properly in the first place.

    I have one of those, in the shape of a Sabre-Lite, but it also suffers from the same old problem as the pi - gpu drivers.  It also suffers from being 5x the cost of a Pi, but is very nice none the less.