Is it time to end our love affair with R-PI?

The RPi provided a full computer with HDMI and USB ports at a revolutionary price. We need to be grateful that this pushed the price of hobby electronic modules down to consumer price points and proved that it was possible to create a successful product using this strategy. The door is now open to someone (including Raspberry) to take this business model to the next level.

Designing a decent computer module that costs between $20 and $50 is no longer hard to imagine. The next level is probably going to be all about the eco system - both hardware and especially software. Imagine a $25 pocket computer that loads self-configuring applications, dragged seamlessly from an app database. Plug and play peripherals. A software development environment that is simple enough to harness a massive number of users developing proper self-configuring apps automatically published in the app database.

It sounds like a smart phone without the display and that may be how it converges, but the  key is an eco system that enables smart people, who are not programmers, to create polished hardware and software applications in their field of expertise.

There are millions of RPIs bought with this promise, but gathering dust because this missing link has not been bridged.

dougw said:

It sounds like a smart phone without the display and that may be how it converges, but the  key is an eco system that enables smart people, who are not programmers, to create polished hardware and software applications in their field of expertise.

You may not be surprised to learn that in 'newer' communities that revolve around hardware modding, a staple, standard, typical answer is often:

"Why bother doing that when you can just use a smartphone? android phones are cheap, just use one of those"

Mostly gone are the days of encouraging you to customise and roll your own with electronic components.

Path of least resistance I suppose.

Reminds me of when I first was starting out in electronics and the ol' timers used to spurn the likes of the 555 timer as a waste of money and 'much better to do it with discrete components'.

Through the years I've seen this shift and the ol' timers spurn the microcontroller as a waste of time and money and 'much better to do it with a 555 timer'.

In later years, this has shifted again with microcontroller vs SBC and again with SBC vs smartphone... 

Reminds me of when I first was starting out in electronics and the ol' timers used to spurn the likes of the 555 timer as a waste of money and 'much better to do it with discrete components'.

Through the years I've seen this shift and the ol' timers spurn the microcontroller as a waste of time and money and 'much better to do it with a 555 timer'.

In later years, this has shifted again with microcontroller vs SBC and again with SBC vs smartphone... 

Half yes, half no

a SBC will only replace a microcontroller if neither budget nor power consumption are at play. 

I think we sometimes suffer from Maker Blindness. Consumer industry thinks differently.