Actions
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 70 replies
  • Subscribers 2763 subscribers
  • Views 7839 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Roadtesting stats

neuromodulator

Today out of boredom and curiosity, motivated by other posts on site stats I decided to compute some stats of the published roadtests. There are a couple of interesting things that can be computed and would be interesting to know, specially in terms of correlations. For instance, do member points increase the chances of winning expensive items? What about number of posts? There are many questions I was wondering about to better understand the dynamics of the system. One of the first questions (and easiest to answer with my data) was how many users have won and published different amount of roadtests. And the results I obtained were these:

 

1: 359

2: 68

3: 32

4: 11

5: 9

6: 10

7: 7

8: 2

9: 0

10: 2

11: 3

12: 1

13: 1

14: 2

15: 0

16: 0

17: 1

18: 1

 

That is, 356 users have won and published 1 roadtest, and 1 user has won and published 18 roadtests. Ideally I would like to count won roadtests (not just published ones), having such data would also be useful to calculate the number of users that win roadtests and never publish anything. Other interesting stats could be to analyse trends, for instance, have the number of words in roadtests reviews increased? As the competition has gotten harder, I would expect to see some visible trends since the beginning of the roadtesting program.

Parents

  • It would be interesting to know the remarkable people in the category

     

    12: 1

    13: 1

    14: 2

    15: 0

    16: 0

    17: 1

    18: 1

     

    image

  • in reply to snidhi

    Sure, here they are:

    1: 359

    2: 68

    3: 32

    4: 11 ['dixon415', 'ralphjy', 'Fred27', 'waelect', 'ninjatrent', 'ciorga', 'clem57', 'greenben214', 'tayken', 'manlong', 'bhaveshj']

    5: 9 ['gordonmx', 'packetgeek', 'jkutzsch', 'jancumps', 'WarrenW', 'matfur92', 'Workshopshed', 'violet', 'rwslaugh']

    6: 10 ['Kilohercas', 'mcb1', 'michaelwylie', 'Nitin_Bhaskar', 'geralds', 'sakthi.1260', 'DAB', 'mconners', 'dwinhold', 'refaqtor']

    7: 7 ['gam3t3ch', 'balearicdynamics', 'nermash', 'ljakes', 'Instructorman', 'ss_shrenik', 'gregoryfenton']

    8: 2 ['s2000gt', 'jdlui']

    9: 0

    10: 2 ['MARK2011', 'fvan']

    11: 3 ['gsgill112', 'lui_gough', 'peteroakes']

    12: 1 ['dougw']

    13: 1 ['kas.lewis']

    14: 2 ['gpolder', 'ipv1']

    15: 0

    16: 0

    17: 1 ['hlipka']

    18: 1 ['shabaz']

  • in reply to neuromodulator

    Well, thanks for doing the math and confirming that I'm there amongst the "long tail" - mine's going to change sooner rather than later image.

     

    But that being said, on a serious note, I think part of the reason has to do with how many items of interest come up and how many times a given member has applied. My success rates haven't been half-bad but I do pick and choose and consistently submit applications for anything of interest. Others may have given up after a single or second no-win-situation or forgotten about the community altogether. As Randall has made clear in the past - quality applications are key and it's likely that those who have some experience will be chosen again because they are a "safer bet" for element14 so as to ensure delivery, because they have a track record that can be judged by application vs delivered review. Likewise, those who may have won in the past have an incentive to "keep the ball rolling" now that they understand the system and how to write applications for RoadTests - after I wrote a few applications, I got the hang of it and what was a bit of a "chore" initially turned into something I do almost automatically. Likewise, members who have been around for longer have a much higher probability of hanging around long enough to see a number of desirable items, attempted to win a number of times and may have (in the end) struck it lucky as previous reviewers didn't re-apply for the same class of equipment.

     

    So I don't think it's a surprise to see the names that you do, nor do I think it's a big surprise that of many of the RoadTesters have only done one or two tests. What is more interesting is to think the sheer number of items element14 have generously shipped out to all reviewers combined ... and the cost that must have entailed.

     

    - Gough

  • in reply to rscasny

    Hahaha ... I think the STOP sign Is iconic and will indeed push the applicant to stop and read the warning.  May be an "!" Sign will go the trick image

     

    //Guri

  • in reply to rscasny

    No, on the contrary. It's good. No one will skip reading.

     

    I liked

  • in reply to jpnbino

    I can remove the stop sign.

     

    Randall

  • in reply to rscasny

    Perfect,

     

    It wouldn't be better without that STOP sign. I hope applications improve and those who are really committed get right.

  • in reply to jpnbino

    I was going to talk about that in one of my future conversations with the RoadTester group, but your question made me think to do it now. Our developers improved the functionality so I can modify the roadtest application somewhat with a template. You will now see the following message once you click the enroll button and scroll to the comments section of the form:

    image

    This seems to be working; I have been getting better applications in the past week.

Reply
  • in reply to jpnbino

    I was going to talk about that in one of my future conversations with the RoadTester group, but your question made me think to do it now. Our developers improved the functionality so I can modify the roadtest application somewhat with a template. You will now see the following message once you click the enroll button and scroll to the comments section of the form:

    image

    This seems to be working; I have been getting better applications in the past week.

Children