How about reducing the amount of software in a car. Why is a software actuated throttle better than a Bowden cable operated throttle? The Bowden cable is simple, cheap, reliable, fixable. The software solution is neither of these things. Maybe the software solution could yield a small improvement in MPG, but for sure when it fails there will be a time when the repair cost (so called "computer board") will be too expensive relative to the perceived value of the car and the car will be scrapped. The environmental cost of scrapping an otherwise usable car must exceed that of the small extra MPG of the software solution? This also of course extends to some of the other software solutions in the car. Heaven forbid when they start introducing steering by wire!
R