Hi Cabe,
If an engineer is back upped by his management he will feel less stress and this is good for his creativity. Also he is more willing to accept assignments beyond his expertise, without have the risk of carreer consequences in case of failure. This is the best environment to work in. I know that this is not real life... management most of the time do not trust their engineers as they have the reputation of making things more complicated as they are and always seeing the negative side of things (risk analysis!?). The same lack of respect is seen between all functions within a company. I think the best approach would be trying to do your own job as efficient as possible and hoping that the 'next' guy in line will do the same. A company is pretty much a complicated machine where everyone is part of the machine. One failing part might mean that the whole machine is down...
Best regards,
Enrico Migchels
Hello Cabe,
Your outlook on life is way too negative for me - look on the bright side !!!!
Ask not for examples of management screw-ups, bailed out or not by the heroic efforts of engineers, but instead look for those examples where inspired leadership has achieved great things for both company and employees.
I've been on both sides of the fence, being an engineer and running a company employing several engineers. For the last 9 years I have worked on my own as an independent engineer.
I have worked with some great engineers, managers and sales people - none of them perfect in every way but I've found I learn much more by looking for what people can do rather than what they can't.
If your boss or customer doesn't see things your way is it because he's wrong or you're wrong - or perhaps you are not making the effort to speak his langauge. When your colleagues don't understand (on a regular basis) perhaps you need to explain better.
I rather like managers - they get to look after all the boring stuff I hate like getting the floors swept and the bins emptied !
Hi Michael,
You are right in your way. You have been on both sides of the fence. You understood the dynamics and then set up your organization with the set of engineers who had your desired skill and who could perform what they are expected of.
But, think of an ongoing organization where in difficult times(maybe for whatever reasons) the cream performers have left for greener pastures, and new are recruited to meet the immediate vacuum. Getting the right kind of people is often taxing in terms of time and effort. Pressure is built-up on the existing lot to perform.
I think Cabe is referring to this. People who remain behind have their own seats to save. In the bargain, the average performers get targetted leaving behind the residue.
Think over.
Regards,
Thomas
I've been on both sides too, and still am in fact. I have experienced the "design us a miracle" situation firsthand, aside from seeing it happen to others.
So, I was wondering if this is a common happening in the community of design engineers. And at the same time, I also want to hear engineers boast as they tell a story of how they actually did create a miracle.
A few times I've had great help from management and/or employees. I don't disagree, excellent management practices can lead to fantastic work output. But there is an uneven balance between the good and bad. So, tell us a story about either.
Cabe