If the container is a cylinder with a fixed diameter, you can meaure the thickness of each layer of liquid (assuming they seperate), but to be within 1/10th of a gallon accuracy would mean you must be able to accurately a measure thickness of ~.001" for water and know the density of the oil. At a radius of 5', a gallon of water only has a thickness of .02".
Gordon,
That is the challenge. To make it easier, let's say the container is over 3/4 of the way filled, but the amounts of the various liquids is not set.
Thoughts?
Cabe
Tom,
That is really not an option. The container is too large, and the contents of the container change quite regularly. I want to monitor the vat 24/7 with constant precision. And hiring a guy to "eyeball" the levels seems like it may lead to inaccurate results.
Have any other ideas from an EDE viewpoint?
Cabe
A possible solution could be the measurment of resistivity change using a vertically inserted small electrodes from the top of the container (controlled by a motorised system allowing a fine control and measurment of the level of insertion of the electrodes within the container).
We will notice a resistivity change when crossing interfaces between air, liquid1 and liquid 2.
An enhancement of this solution could be to use a laser telemeter from the top to measure height of the the two liquids togheter.... when this level changes we control the electrodes system at the interface between liquid 1 and liquid 2 so that we avoid that the electrodes system be continiously moving up down and down up for real time measurments. It just needs to be moved to monitor the liquids interface height change.
Lotfi
Lotfi,
I like the laser solution, less moving parts. If the laser was turned on from the top, how would you measure the lower liquids level? Would there be two bounceback signals from the various liquids?
And if the top liquid is dense oil, the laser may not penetrate enough to bounce back from the second level.
Is ultrasonic an option?
Cabe