A possible solution could be the measurment of resistivity change using a vertically inserted small electrodes from the top of the container (controlled by a motorised system allowing a fine control and measurment of the level of insertion of the electrodes within the container).
We will notice a resistivity change when crossing interfaces between air, liquid1 and liquid 2.
An enhancement of this solution could be to use a laser telemeter from the top to measure height of the the two liquids togheter.... when this level changes we control the electrodes system at the interface between liquid 1 and liquid 2 so that we avoid that the electrodes system be continiously moving up down and down up for real time measurments. It just needs to be moved to monitor the liquids interface height change.
Lotfi
A possible solution could be the measurment of resistivity change using a vertically inserted small electrodes from the top of the container (controlled by a motorised system allowing a fine control and measurment of the level of insertion of the electrodes within the container).
We will notice a resistivity change when crossing interfaces between air, liquid1 and liquid 2.
An enhancement of this solution could be to use a laser telemeter from the top to measure height of the the two liquids togheter.... when this level changes we control the electrodes system at the interface between liquid 1 and liquid 2 so that we avoid that the electrodes system be continiously moving up down and down up for real time measurments. It just needs to be moved to monitor the liquids interface height change.
Lotfi
Lotfi,
I like the laser solution, less moving parts. If the laser was turned on from the top, how would you measure the lower liquids level? Would there be two bounceback signals from the various liquids?
And if the top liquid is dense oil, the laser may not penetrate enough to bounce back from the second level.
Is ultrasonic an option?
Cabe