Actions
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 289 subscribers
  • Views 2768 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Do you think a framework for building and implementing a (simple) SCADA is needed?

Julia
I hear a lot of people talking about the annoyance of price estimates (meaning they don't get a clear, transparent price from the beginning) and the costly engineering that seems to never end.
Do you think that a step-by-step, clear process and course of action from A to Z would be beneficial for companies?
And I'm not talking here about SCADA software, like Ignition.
I'm talking about using Ignition to build and implement a fully working SCADA solution, customized to your company BUT you know the price and the methods that will be used (it's a replicable framework to get similar results for multiple companies - and the results would be a SCADA solution without the headaches of the unknown prices and engineering characteristics).
 
Do you think the industrial space could use something like that?
Parents

  • No more senseless layers, please! And will this monster be open-source or just another windows thing. I don't know why you must reinvent the wheel? They built it for folks that are addicted to W11, etc. Both Java 8 and above and C in a Linux environment all support booting and then starting a scheduler. 

Reply

  • No more senseless layers, please! And will this monster be open-source or just another windows thing. I don't know why you must reinvent the wheel? They built it for folks that are addicted to W11, etc. Both Java 8 and above and C in a Linux environment all support booting and then starting a scheduler. 

Children
  • in reply to phoenixcomm

    Open-source. And I don't think I'm reinventing the wheel, but rather optimizing an otherwise difficult process by reducing engineering time & cost. It's not a "plug-and-play" product or anything, but a Modus Operandi that removes the headache of confusing prices and over-the-top engineering. What do you think about that?