element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Internet of Things
  • Technologies
  • More
Internet of Things
Blog The Internet of Things ? What's that ? (A relative explanation)
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Internet of Things requires membership for participation - click to join
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: cstanton
  • Date Created: 29 Mar 2014 5:08 PM Date Created
  • Views 1555 views
  • Likes 1 like
  • Comments 9 comments
  • things
  • of
  • internet
  • connected
  • internet_of_everything
  • sensors
  • internetofeverything
  • internet_of_things
  • internetofthings
  • iot
  • sensor
  • everything
Related
Recommended

The Internet of Things ? What's that ? (A relative explanation)

cstanton
cstanton
29 Mar 2014

Internet

noun

A global computer network providing a variety of information and communication facilities, consisting of interconnected networks using standardized communication protocols.

of

preposition

After a number, quantifier, or partitive noun, with the word denoting the whole functioning as the head of the phrase.

Thing(s)

noun

An object that one need not, cannot, or does not wish to give a specific name to.


I can't help but to take this question literally when I come across it. So looked first to the Oxford English dictionary, the Internet of Things is in essence, a way of telling you about something but in particular using a computer network to do so.


image

Control


The intention of the Internet of Things is to digest and control these objects in a way that we typically do not, currently. It was not that long ago, that the television had buttons which required you to get up off your sofa, walk across the living room floor and push with an almighty THUNK as the button hit home (if you could call it a button) and changed the channel. Some television sets directly had the tuning dial instead to get the channel you wanted!


Not long after, the concept of the remote control was born. The buttons were no longer on the television! instead, they were on a box, connected seemingly via some strange rope or string that helped this box tell the television what channel you wanted. Then the unthinkable happened. It was neutered and the cord was cut. Wireless remote controls were then the norm and it wasn't until even more recently, that this migrated, on some televisions, to be integrated with your mobile phone via software where it mingles with TV Guides to even let you know what's on next.

 

In this case, the television is a 'thing' and the remote control is the part that has helped it to become potentially accessed over the internet (without even touching on streaming audio or video to it) because once it's on say, your phone, there's little to no reason why it can't be controlled via your computer. In some households it is.

 

Measure, Observe and Feedback


This is the part that's difficult to quantify because it is potentially very open to interpretation, at present the Internet of Things is seen to utilise sensors to act upon such as:

 

  • Inductive
  • Capacitive
  • Temperature
  • Humidity
  • Pressure
  • Infra-red
  • Electromagnetic waves
  • Acoustic
  • Biological
  • Gas
  • Location
  • Orientation
  • Directional forces
  • Forms of radiation

 

And so on for measurement. Where it differs with standard, engineered practices for using a sensor, for example using a temperature sensor to make sure that a motor doesn't overheat out of specification for safety or an infra-red sensor as part of a limit switch; these sensors are attached to objects that typically wouldn't have them attached.

 

For example (because I like lists):

 

  • A capacitive sensor/sheet attached to a door, to tell when a person knocks on it
  • An acoustic sensor to detect when a dog is barking
  • Accelerometer to a persons arm as a way of identify what type of exercise they're undertaking. You could also have a pressure and humidity sensor in your umbrella as a way to detect if you should be opening it soon.

 

This is where observation also feeds into it. These objects are now becoming devices that report their status and become aware of what situation they are in. This can be very valuable and the data fed back in some form from these self-aware objects can be collated together to provide valuable information about a scenario or person for the purpose of safety, entertainment or education.

 

image

Connected


Or perhaps this heading should be 'mobility' or 'accessibility' because basically you get the information from your sensors and their respective controls then you make it accessible via a medium that's remote from being stood or sat in front of the device and watching it; like you used to do with your television except now you can watch and control your television (at the very least the content of it) from anywhere (but with the advent of 'smart' televisions and the BBC releasing an API (TAL) for it this is also possible).


So this connectivity could be from your phone over Short Message Service (SMS), a local network (WiFi or LAN or CAN) and even the global internet . Hence the name, Internet of Things or, by some, Internet of Everything.


Problems to Overcome


The Internet of (Every)Thing(s) has potential problems. These problems are partly based around:


  • Transport infrastructure of the data collected.
  • Presentation and storage of the data into tangible and coherent and relevant information.
  • Integrity, security and privacy of valuable and sensitive information from collection through to presentation.

 

Transportation

The transport infrastructure, if we consider that all communications from these devices may move to an Internet Protocol (IP) based system will rely on the ability to navigate IPv4 and IPv6, not taking into account intermediate communication methods up until that point. This places an expectancy on the devices to be able to have enough power to use a network stack at some point in its transmission or transportation.

 

Currently a lot of systems are utilising IPv4, of which the global address space has practically ran out. There is a very slow migration to IPv6 which has a significantly larger amount of address spaces available. However, it may come to pass that a translation occurs between the two and IPv4 is used for the smaller networks. I would hazard to suggest that it may not even be required depending on the data collection mechanism (eg. RFID, bluetooth, etc.)

 

Presentation / Storage

If we're suggesting an Internet of Things type of world where potentially every object can feed back details of its existence, then that is a lot of information that needs to be stored somewhere. With the example of a parcel delivery firm, say Amazon and their boxes were able to report their status along the entire route of their journey, globally, then that data requires a transportation mechanism that's accessible almost everywhere and for that information to be stored somewhere. A decision would have to be made as to how valuable the data about to be stored is and what it is intended to be used for.


image

How we view this data is also crucial, it would probably require statistical analysis / processing through a computational system and for ease of use, graphical representation in a way that is easy to understand. At the very least, this would be costly at an enterprise level. For a home user product? depending on the application it would be significantly less. We could suppose that a home user wouldn't need historical data on the state of their belongings or items in the home but it could be sold as a service to do so.


Integrity, Security and Privacy

These are important factors when dealing with confidential data which is also important for safety and protection of its accuracy should always be a consideration. Let's lead with an example:


An elderly lady is wearing a watch that monitors the status of her health, electrocardiography (ECG) signals and how mobile she is. It is customised to the lady and contains a personally identifiable identification number.


Something happens to the lady when she's either traveling or in the home and the watch tries to connect and report that the lady hasn't moved for a long while. The watch attempts to report the current state to a system that can determine if the ECG signals are low and that this is bad and someone should check on the lady.


There are a few areas that could be raised for concern with this Internet of Things scenario (I like lists too, sorry):


  • The information reported by the watch is incorrect (or the watch is actually left off the person) and the actions taken to check on the lady are incorrect.
  • An occurrence could be where the watch was unable to report to the system, or perhaps the wrong watch reported to the system.
  • Someone has intercepted the signal the watch was trying to communicate out, discovers that something has happened to the lady and takes advantage of the situation in a nefarious way
  • The device(s) involved in the system are no longer maintained because of succession to the product (end of life) or the company has gone under, because it was not open source there is no-on left to maintain the system and so the issue goes unreported
  • Corruption occurs in the system or the system does not perform its calculations properly or it does not have redundancy to handle the information thrown at it during maintenance and the situation is ignored or delayed.

 

This list could go on, it is not necessarily exhaustive and in many cases it is not entirely new or exclusive to the Internet of Things, but this should be taken as an expression that it is, until a standard is determined that may be any different, the same as current systems in place. Just that the scale of them by means of size and processors they run on are potentially varied.

 

Should We Do This?


Yes and it helps to be open about it where possible. This helps to maintain systems and with the potential insights monitoring the majority of things can give, it can help to provide insights to bolster the sciences which, I envisage, can provide a positive feedback to help resolve any issues that are observed. Ultimately though, it should provide the feedback that people are often too busy to provide in the form of surveys, interviews and accurate observations.


It should also help to improve storage of data in general and encourage designers to optimise for portability, lower power use, integrity and security of information.



image


image

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • DAB
    DAB over 11 years ago +1
    It still comes down to the issue of what information you collect, from whom and how you plan to use the data. Given the latest furor over the collection of phone call metrics, I find it interesting that…
  • cstanton
    cstanton over 11 years ago in reply to Former Member +1
    Of course, I imagine this is also of interest to police forensics if they were to be so attentive. Regarding laws and acts, it's not only the Data Protection Act which has undergone revisions for inadequacies…
  • ivanovhr9
    ivanovhr9 over 10 years ago in reply to cstanton

    It's always a matter of skills. The better the system is, the longer it will take to be corrupted.

     

    The internet is just another tool that improves performance and helps for the technology evolution. If you want to get advantage of it's possibilities as an advanced user, make sure you know what you are doing!

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 11 years ago in reply to cstanton

    Christopher Stanton wrote:

    But what would you suggest?

    Not really sure. Unfortunately you never have the benefit of hindsight until it's too late.

    I mean it seems that the only winning move is not to play/get involved - but with something like the IoE/IoT it probably can't be helped (much).

    Possibly, but even if you have some IoT devices you don't actually need to give them unhindered access to the internet.  Anything that refuses to function without it's network connection is probably something to be suspicious of.

     

    One thing you mentioned that seems to continually get asked is whether these IoT devices can function standalone after their manufacturer has gone bust or just turned off whatever cloud service supports the device. Very pertinent question... Do we really want to create a situation where you have to send an otherwise perfectly good IoT fridge/freezer to landfill 6months after purchase because the mfg was stupid enough to make the thermostat dependant on a cloud service that's disappeared when they went bust?

     

    Having very recently seen a cloud service for a still current device being turned off by the manufacturer, I can't say I have a lot of faith in the general idea.  In this particular case the device keeps working, you just lose a chunk of useful functionality around the data that it did collect.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • DAB
    DAB over 11 years ago in reply to cstanton

    To make the IoT work, you need an encryption device that ensures that only those people given the key will be able to access the data.

    If you set up multiple layers of encryption, then you greatly reduce the number of people who can access your data.

    Plus the huge number of devices with embedded encryption makes the effort to break the code and access the information more trouble than the potential value of the information.

     

    Encryption will not stop the determined information seeker, but it greatly reduces the casual information capture devices.

     

    DAB

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • cstanton
    cstanton over 11 years ago in reply to Former Member

    Yeah, in a recent article , The Value of Privacy - IEEE - The Institute , it looks like some measures/policies/attempts are being put in place (though it appears mainly as guidelines but in light of recent infiltrations by government/organisations it's not clear how much that's even worth).

     

    But what would you suggest?

     

    I mean it seems that the only winning move is not to play/get involved - but with something like the IoE/IoT it probably can't be helped (much).

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • Former Member
    Former Member over 11 years ago in reply to cstanton

    People are right tp be skeptical.  There's been too many well publicised examples of how personal data has been mis-handled, not just by commercial interests, but by governments who are in a position to compel you to supply it.

    People haven't yet really woken up to the fact that, like with twitter/facebook, the useful gizmo isn't the product. The product is the ability to sell the data they collect about us..

     

    With mountains of data that was never previously available, we don't have the mindset or frame of reference to properly consider the security aspects. That'll come, but could be too late.

    So I'm with Dab, I see the potential, both good and bad and I think we need to take heed of the security concerns.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube