The advantage that fusion has over fission is that there is no runaway effect. In the general case, if something goes wrong then the reaction fails. Also, in most modes that I've heard of, the by-products are MUCH safer, usually not radioactive. Sure the facility is likely to be unusable after an incident, but there is no fallout and it doesn't dose half the continent with radioactive dust.
the only worry about fusion is that it could rapidly converge into higher elements and become unstable to the point where it impodes or explode.
There seems to be a lot of misunderstanding about this process, perhaps because of the tone of the original posting. The ICF process is about as safe as it gets - it just can't implode and it is intended to explode. The amount of radiactivity in each tiny glass ball is very small - the system is fundamentally safe - as soon as anyhting goes wrong it will just stop working. The problems Yuri.. and DAB mention are discussed in https://lasers.llnl.gov/programs/ife/how_ife_works.php
I'm not saying that this system is the complete answer but it deserves serious discussion - the maths is a LOT more credible than that supporting windmills and wave machines.
I did not mean to imply that I was against using the Fusion process, I am not. I have watched the progress from the very early stages and the ability to use lasers to induce a fusion reaction may indeed be near break even or better. If all goes as envisioned, an abundant source of world energy could be at hand.
That said, as a Systems Engineer, I know that there are always unexpected consequences of opening new technology. We have come a long way with using Fusion, but I was just reminding everyone that we still have much to learn. The Sun has many unique properties that supports sustained Fusion reactions. I am not sure if we can account for all of them in a closed environment.
I really hope it does work, but I have waited forty years to see them demonstrate a safe way to use the technology. So far, I have been disappointed at the progress.
Thanks
DAB
I did not mean to imply that I was against using the Fusion process, I am not. I have watched the progress from the very early stages and the ability to use lasers to induce a fusion reaction may indeed be near break even or better. If all goes as envisioned, an abundant source of world energy could be at hand.
That said, as a Systems Engineer, I know that there are always unexpected consequences of opening new technology. We have come a long way with using Fusion, but I was just reminding everyone that we still have much to learn. The Sun has many unique properties that supports sustained Fusion reactions. I am not sure if we can account for all of them in a closed environment.
I really hope it does work, but I have waited forty years to see them demonstrate a safe way to use the technology. So far, I have been disappointed at the progress.
Thanks
DAB