Why do people talk of fusion reactors as being miniature suns? Fusion reactors burn tritium and deuterium. The sun fuses ordinary hydrogen. Totally different fuel, totally different confinement, totally different reaction rates. In fact the sun's specific power, even at the very core, is an order of magnitude lower than that of fermenting beer 7206.contentimage_4751.png
Hi Derek,
I concur, too many people see mushroom clouds at the first mention of using nuclear energy in any form. The fact that it can be used to destroy does not mean that we can not harness the energy from these normally occuring reactions for be benefit for all.
Without nuclear fission and fusion, there would be NO life in the universe.
Think about the power of fusion the next time you see one of the anti-nuke proponents at the beach. An hour in sunlight produces more radiation exposure than most people get from any nuclear power plant.
All we are and all that we shall ever be is the result of the basic nuclear reactions occuring since time began!
Thanks
DAB
Not quite since time began - more like 3 minutes later. 3681.contentimage_1.png
Man is capable of creating a "SUN" We call them Thermonuclear (Hydrogen) bombs and there are many thousands of them. They're small and short lived but do the job that was intended of them
Jeff
I would assume that the seawater is simply being used as a source of deuterium.
Only one part in 6500 is deuterium and it's uneconomical to attempt to extract more than a small fraction of it. What's left is 99.995% of the original water which is perfectly safe to dump back where it came from, although a fair proportion of it will have been sufficiently purified en route to be saleable as a product in itself (or used on-site). You'd probably use ten gallons of "liquid deuterium ore", not just one, to pull out a few grams of deuterium oxide - the equivalent of 300 gallons of gasolene.
That would be in a reactor which, mark you, doesn't yet exist. Getting fusion fuel never was a problem, creating a reactor most definitely is.
Are we really need another sun for alternative energy? Does the sun was too hot as we are now experiencing global warming. Even you're in a place were trees are all around you, you still feel the heat of the sun like ants biting you.
No reactor-tourism then? No hordes of town folk in their Bermuda shorts flocking to get a reactor-tan? I think you are mistaken! Certainly where I am right now, during the day the sky is grey, the ground is wet, people are getting sleepy and irritable and we have another five months of it to look forward to. Those of us who can afford it and square our consciences over global warming may get away to a seedy foreign tourist resort for a week, but wouldn't it be nice if we could just packs the kids in the back of the car and bimble off for a day in the artifical sun just up the road from here; giving ourselves skin cancer and being sick with too much ice cream all the year round?