element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Test & Tools
  • Technologies
  • More
Test & Tools
Blog Portable Oscilloscopes will Require Upgrades to Become Widely Adopted
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Test & Tools to participate - click to join for free!
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: Catwell
  • Date Created: 4 Oct 2024 7:25 PM Date Created
  • Views 1681 views
  • Likes 8 likes
  • Comments 1 comment
  • test
  • element14
  • measure
  • oscilloscope
  • cabeatwell
  • tools
  • survey
  • test_and_measurement
Related
Recommended

Portable Oscilloscopes will Require Upgrades to Become Widely Adopted

Catwell
Catwell
4 Oct 2024

image

Some o-scope users state they don't use portable equipment enough to warrant having one, while others feel they're limited in features. (Image credit: Flickr)

Handheld oscilloscopes are compact, portable versions of their desktop counterparts and are becoming a must-have tool for engineers in the field. The user-friendly devices provide a convenient way to measure and analyze electric signals without being bulky and are ideal for troubleshooting systems in remote locations.

As engineering roles continue to evolve, the demand for portable testing tools grows, making portable o-scopes an ideal solution for engineers working outside traditional labs. To get a better understanding of their usage, element14 recently conducted a poll among its readers, asking engineers how often they rely on handheld oscilloscopes, and the answers may surprise you.

"Engineers are on the go. Gone are the days when engineers do most of their work in the lab or on the bench. They use test equipment in the facility or at a job site, that is, out-of-the-ordinary locations. For these settings, engineers need handheld, portable equipment to make precise, accurate measurements, stated element14's [vivekvelusamy]. "Handheld oscilloscopes are the focus of this month's Question of the Month: How often do you use a Handheld Oscilloscope?"

According to the poll results, 52% of engineers or forum users say they use a handheld oscilloscope occasionally, reflecting its utilization in specific situations. Meanwhile, 9% reported using one twice a week, and another 9% reported using them 3 or 4 times a week. A smaller percentage, 7%, rely on them daily, showing that while essential for certain functions, the utilization of portable o-scopes is clearly driven by the nature of the work or project.

While a majority of respondents use handheld o-scopes occasionally, others point out that the devices are limited in features and functionality. Some engineers and forum users pointed out that handheld o-scopes lack features such as decent-sized screens, while lower resolutions could add to inaccuracies in readings. Others feel the lack of bandwidth on some portable units is limiting, as some exclude the higher frequency waveforms. Still, others state they simply don't need them or prefer to use USB-based or benchtop o-scopes for their work and projects.

Portable oscilloscopes, with their lightweight and compact designs, make them easy to carry but come at a cost, most notably, their display size. While advancements have been made to improve the display quality and readability, handheld o-scopes can sometimes limit the amount of waveform data observed at a given time. That said, some options, such as the tablet oscilloscope, offer larger displays but lack the full functionality of benchtop models. Implementing larger and higher resolution displays and touchscreen interfaces would improve visibility and ease of use, while more intuitive UIs could help boost users' experiences.

Increasing bandwidth to handle higher frequency signals and improving sampling rates would make portable o-scopes more versatile, especially in the field. Moreso if they are integrated with advanced signal analysis capabilities, better memory, and expanded protocol support. Field engineers would also get a boost with better battery performance and efficient power management, making portable o-scopes more practical.

Robust connectivity options would also help to improve their use, as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and 5G for real-time data sharing could help streamline collaboration between field engineers and remote teams. Offering competitively priced units with balanced performance could also help broaden the appeal of using handheld o-scopes, or perhaps developing a modular approach where users could swap out and upgrade features and functionality would help increase that usage.

With those ideas in mind, handheld oscilloscopes still have their purposes as a must-have tool for engineers who work in the field and even those working on projects at home. The ability to quickly check waveforms with a simple portable unit has its merits, but without that increased functionality, the adoption rate will remain slow.

Have a story tip? Message me at: http://twitter.com/Cabe_Atwell

  • Sign in to reply
Parents
  • battlecoder
    battlecoder 11 months ago

    I've been thinking a lot about this after the poll was up. And I played a bit with my scopes to explore their usefulness and compare them against each other (which I wanted to turn into a post but I couldn't find a way of keeping it concise).


    What I found, however, is that more than bandwidth the real struggle seems to be the sampling and triggering. A couple of scopes I own, failed to trigger consistently, resulting in jittering traces and missing bits of signal.

    Sometimes this happens because cheap handheld scopes push their ADCs beyond their specs, and do interleaved sampling with very little or no correction, so their "waveform reconstruction" is slow and inaccurate, giving the "jiggly" trace. Since most of them trigger by checking the waveform buffer (and sometimes that implementation is severely flawed) that leads to a slow reaction time, missing events in the signal, flickering or jiggling, etc.

    The fact that some of the cheaper scopes exaggerate their specs and struggle to work with anything but the most basic, periodic, low frequency signals, turn them into a frustrating experience. And that's the kind of scope most hobbyist end up buying (I mean, I'm sure a beginner is not buying a Fluke handheld scope, which probably meets specs perfectly, and samples and triggers just fine)

    Having said that, not all of the cheap scopes are trash. I don't own any fancy handheld scope, and yet a couple of the ones I have seem to be reasonably well implemented, and have proved to be extremely useful to me, despite being "basic", feature-wise

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • battlecoder
    battlecoder 11 months ago

    I've been thinking a lot about this after the poll was up. And I played a bit with my scopes to explore their usefulness and compare them against each other (which I wanted to turn into a post but I couldn't find a way of keeping it concise).


    What I found, however, is that more than bandwidth the real struggle seems to be the sampling and triggering. A couple of scopes I own, failed to trigger consistently, resulting in jittering traces and missing bits of signal.

    Sometimes this happens because cheap handheld scopes push their ADCs beyond their specs, and do interleaved sampling with very little or no correction, so their "waveform reconstruction" is slow and inaccurate, giving the "jiggly" trace. Since most of them trigger by checking the waveform buffer (and sometimes that implementation is severely flawed) that leads to a slow reaction time, missing events in the signal, flickering or jiggling, etc.

    The fact that some of the cheaper scopes exaggerate their specs and struggle to work with anything but the most basic, periodic, low frequency signals, turn them into a frustrating experience. And that's the kind of scope most hobbyist end up buying (I mean, I'm sure a beginner is not buying a Fluke handheld scope, which probably meets specs perfectly, and samples and triggers just fine)

    Having said that, not all of the cheap scopes are trash. I don't own any fancy handheld scope, and yet a couple of the ones I have seem to be reasonably well implemented, and have proved to be extremely useful to me, despite being "basic", feature-wise

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube