Road Test Fears

Taxes. I used to be quite involved in RoadTest, but something changed on E14 with the tax situation and I haven't been a very active member of that group since.

Hey michaelwylie,

I'm curious now, could you elaborate ?

Kas

I believe michaelwylie is making reference to the fact that US residents now have to claim prizes as income if they are valued over $700 or maybe $750.  So you Canadians are still good to go!  :-)  And I think that is the value of the full MSRP of the product.

Thats a bummer, because it takes away some of the good roadtesters

Kas

jkutzsch is correct. I'm not sure what changed, but the change has made the fun of RoadTesting cost money. I'm ok with "Here's a piece of gear, tell us what you think", but I'm not ok with it costing me money. It takes the fun out of it.

To be honest I would pay to be apart of the road testing group.... let alone claiming it.   So there is no loop around it as "gift" or is it always under "prize" since it is like a draw for the best.  This doesn't make sense to me why they would categorize it as such.  What if a subscription was payed 1 buck a month wouldn't that kill the "prize" effect? 

I hear you, but as I say this has taken a lot of good people off teh road test program which effectively make the community and the manufacturer suffer by not getting good quality review. Just look at some of the recent ones... it turns on its specs are great love it 60/60... Thanks for the 500 words... enjoy the product.

Any how just my 2 cents

Kas

I don't disagree with you.

I haven't had a 60/60 road test yet I don't see how there can be so many that are as I know even products I have seen reviewed I wouldn't give them such a high rating but then the inadequate review verifies its just a slap together. Either they think they will get more road tests the higher the rating on a product or the less explanation into their scoring of the product is needed the higher the rating. As someone that doesn't know much about the more expensive boards and products I rely heavily on my peers and their reviews and tests.   I still think a subscription based road test would be great and would probably void out the prize  part as well, I would love to have a better opportunity to  have a road test with a lot not taking part (Americans) but I would also like better road test reviews or at least a honest review or outline on it even if its not in depth.   So if it was a cross the board that everyone pays for the program or a "upgraded" road test group I think that would be cool.  But being Canadian I am not plagued with that but would like to have a resolution to for my neighbors down south.

Not sure if this is something that can be looked into or not but would be cool if there was a loop to get it so they could participate more.  

I haven't had a 60/60 road test yet I don't see how there can be so many that are as I know even products I have seen reviewed I wouldn't give them such a high rating but then the inadequate review verifies its just a slap together. Either they think they will get more road tests the higher the rating on a product or the less explanation into their scoring of the product is needed the higher the rating. As someone that doesn't know much about the more expensive boards and products I rely heavily on my peers and their reviews and tests.   I still think a subscription based road test would be great and would probably void out the prize  part as well, I would love to have a better opportunity to  have a road test with a lot not taking part (Americans) but I would also like better road test reviews or at least a honest review or outline on it even if its not in depth.   So if it was a cross the board that everyone pays for the program or a "upgraded" road test group I think that would be cool.  But being Canadian I am not plagued with that but would like to have a resolution to for my neighbors down south.

Not sure if this is something that can be looked into or not but would be cool if there was a loop to get it so they could participate more.