Beginner looking to place a connector on the bottom side of the board. How
do i do this ? I intend to sandwich two boards together using a 12 pin SIL
connector (header on one board and plug on the other).
Thanks in advance.
Beginner looking to place a connector on the bottom side of the board. How
do i do this ? I intend to sandwich two boards together using a 12 pin SIL
connector (header on one board and plug on the other).
Thanks in advance.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:48:24 -0500, "Bert Menkveld" <bert@betech.biz>
wrote:
Mike wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:03:28 -0400, "Bert Menkveld" <bert@betech.biz>
wrote:
John wrote:
Beginner looking to place a connector on the bottom side of the
board. How do i do this ? I intend to sandwich two boards together
using a 12 pin SIL connector (header on one board and plug on the
other). Thanks in advance.
Mirror
That seems more like a workaround than the proper way. Is that the
most appropriate way, within the capabilities of Eagle? Or is it the
only way?
That really is the "proper" way. I don't know of any other way to place a
component on the bottom of the board.
I ask this because doing it that way is problematic. When you put a
surface mount on top, and then a surface mount on bottome, you can
route between the two, and the ratsnests disappear, as if the
connection was made, but the connections aren't actually made.
To connect a surface layer pad between top and bottom requires a via.
But when I test this, one can draw a route (not wire) between two
connecting pads, and the vias disappear. How does one verify
connections if this is the case?
Hmmm, I'm afraid I don't really understand what's happening here. I have
routed SMT components on both sides of the board, and have not encountered
the sort of misbehaviour you're describing. Things do tend to get more
confusing when you have parts on both sides of the board.
If you can't figure out what's happening, maybe you could post a small
sample board so we can see the problem you're describing.
Oops! My mistake. Because you were so sure this would work, I checked
it again. There actually still is a ratsnest line. It's just very
short, from the end of the top surface part to the pad on the bottom
surface part. I was expecting to see the ratsnest from the original
pin to the 2nd pin.
The other indication that mirror works is that when I do use the via,
the trace will auto complete when I end on the 2nd pad. Doesn't do
that if I try this without a via. . I don't use boards with
components on both sides (yet but have one planned) so I guess I
jumped to a false conclusion. Sorry.
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:48:24 -0500, "Bert Menkveld" <bert@betech.biz>
wrote:
Mike wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:03:28 -0400, "Bert Menkveld" <bert@betech.biz>
wrote:
John wrote:
Beginner looking to place a connector on the bottom side of the
board. How do i do this ? I intend to sandwich two boards together
using a 12 pin SIL connector (header on one board and plug on the
other). Thanks in advance.
Mirror
That seems more like a workaround than the proper way. Is that the
most appropriate way, within the capabilities of Eagle? Or is it the
only way?
That really is the "proper" way. I don't know of any other way to place a
component on the bottom of the board.
I ask this because doing it that way is problematic. When you put a
surface mount on top, and then a surface mount on bottome, you can
route between the two, and the ratsnests disappear, as if the
connection was made, but the connections aren't actually made.
To connect a surface layer pad between top and bottom requires a via.
But when I test this, one can draw a route (not wire) between two
connecting pads, and the vias disappear. How does one verify
connections if this is the case?
Hmmm, I'm afraid I don't really understand what's happening here. I have
routed SMT components on both sides of the board, and have not encountered
the sort of misbehaviour you're describing. Things do tend to get more
confusing when you have parts on both sides of the board.
If you can't figure out what's happening, maybe you could post a small
sample board so we can see the problem you're describing.
Oops! My mistake. Because you were so sure this would work, I checked
it again. There actually still is a ratsnest line. It's just very
short, from the end of the top surface part to the pad on the bottom
surface part. I was expecting to see the ratsnest from the original
pin to the 2nd pin.
The other indication that mirror works is that when I do use the via,
the trace will auto complete when I end on the 2nd pad. Doesn't do
that if I try this without a via. . I don't use boards with
components on both sides (yet but have one planned) so I guess I
jumped to a false conclusion. Sorry.