Hi Guys
I'm totally new to this. I'm trying to build a 4 channel opamp (boost my signal about 100x)
I'm hoping someone has the time to quickly check my design and see if it makes sense and perhaps let me know how to improve it.
Thanks
Jacob
Hi Guys
I'm totally new to this. I'm trying to build a 4 channel opamp (boost my signal about 100x)
I'm hoping someone has the time to quickly check my design and see if it makes sense and perhaps let me know how to improve it.
Thanks
Jacob
opamp.zip |
Guillaume barrey[1
wrote on Mon, 12 October 2015 05:20]Hi,
Yes you understand very well, all GND will be connected together. Here
we only speak about where physically it's better to do it. You can
do
it every where, it will work, but some location can reduce noise and
measurement error, and other will be introduce more noise.
Since your cell need no power, the best will be to use a *+twisted
pair
wire+* for each cell, and connect it directly to the board, so for
each
channel you need to add an extra connection for the GND of the cell.
For the acquisition device, it's dependent on if it have an extra pin
for GND or not.... If yes, you use a separate twisted pair wire
for
each channel and use this extra pin.
if not, then you can also use twisted pair wire but on the
acquisition device side you connect all the GND to the acquisition
device GND pin.
In both case on your amplifier board, you choose a 3 pins connector
for
each channel: input, GND and output. On the GND pin, you connect the
GND
wire from your cell and the GND wire from the acquisition device
together.
Guillaume
--
To view any images and attachments in this post, visit:
OK, cool thanks.
So version god knows what is attached
(I must admit I think the traces on this version are a lot cleaner than
some of my previous ones)
With regard to twisted pair I guess I could use some CAT 5e Ethernet cable
I have lying around (somewhere).
Thanks once again!
-Jacob
--
Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca. Where the CadSoft EAGLE community meets.
test6.zip |
Hi,
That's Great !
Just a last little advice for the GND plane.
When my board is almost finish, I do some little adjustment to be sure that my GND plane will be good.... It's hard to explain with my poor English....(sorry to be a French frog)
I hide all layer except the dimension, via, pads and the copper layer on which I work, and I run a ratsnest command to process the polygons
Then you use the show command and select the polygon (in your case you only have GND). The polygon is highlighted so you can see it well.
Now you try to imagine how the current can flow from here and there...
Sometime you will see that for connecting to point that are not really far from each other, the current need to do a huge travel because the plane is interrupted by some other tracks. Sometime it's easy to reduce drastically the effective distance just by moving a little bit a track or a part.
In your example, the +24V track going from C1 to IC1 completely cut he polygon. If you move down a little this track, the GND plane will be not cut any more...
That way, I check all the little improvement I can do, and some time it's not enough, so I reduce the isolation or the wire of the polygon.
I do that for all polygons, layer by layer (copper layers of course).
But any way good job !
Guillaume.
Guillaume barrey[1
wrote on Wed, 14 October 2015 13:10]Hi,
That's Great !
Just a last little advice for the GND plane.
When my board is almost finish, I do some little adjustment to be sure
that my GND plane will be good.... It's hard to explain with my poor
English....(sorry to be a French frog:p)
I hide all layer except the dimension, via, pads and the copper layer
on
which I work, and I run a ratsnest command to process the polygons
Then you use the show command and select the polygon (in your case
you
only have GND). The polygon is highlighted so you can see it well.
Now you try to imagine how the current can flow from here and there...
Sometime you will see that for connecting to point that are not
really
far from each other, the current need to do a huge travel because the
plane is interrupted by some other tracks. Sometime it's easy to
reduce
drastically the effective distance just by moving a little bit a track
or a part.
In your example, the +24V track going from C1 to IC1 completely cut he
polygon. If you move down a little this track, the GND plane will be
not
cut any more...
That way, I check all the little improvement I can do, and some time
it's not enough, so I reduce the isolation or the wire of the polygon.
I do that for all polygons, layer by layer (copper layers of course).
But any way good job !
Guillaume.
--
To view any images and attachments in this post, visit:
Hi Guys
Sorry for the slow response.
Thank you all for all the help. I feel I have learned a lot already!
Best wishes
Jacob
--
Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca. Where the CadSoft EAGLE community meets.
hi,
I've viewed your layout and edit it.
some tips for your next pcb
* first of all: place parts, route power supply & gnd, critical tracks like bus and the all the other things
* layout the pcb by following your nets of the schematics
* try parts in different ways THT (horizontal / vertical) or SMD
* route the tracks as short as possible
* place holes to fix or parts to screw your pcb on something
An example off your pcb with short tracks, etc. is attached.
Test5_edit.zip |