On 2010-03-10 08:39:48 +0100, Oliver Betz <obetz@despammed.com> said:
>> Because I use a MAC there are NO GERBER viewers available. ( that I know of
Me too. I have searched.
I knew about http://gerbv.gpleda.org/index.html , but
Gerbv. I have several Finck and MacPorts packages compiled form source
here, something Mac user never have to do and most can't. I can get
Gerbv to display anything.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gerberviewermac
reveals more.
Indeed. But they don't work. This one, for instance:
http://www.brothersoft.com/gerber-viewer-for-mac-download-197933.html
This may sound silly, but experienced Mac users expect more. The site
of these guys scares 99% of Mac users, and rightly so. A developer that
makes ugly sites like this, will naver make a good Mac program.
This one does work:
http://www.mcn-audio.com/sharewares/index.html
At least on 10.4.11 and a G5.
Thank you.
--
Eur van Andel eur@fiwihex.nl
Eur van Andel wrote:
>>> Because I use a MAC there are NO GERBER viewers available. ( that I know of
>
>Me too. I have searched.
That's bad for the Mac users.
Nevertheless I think a Gerber viewer should be a separate application.
It's to check Eagle output, isn't it? So it should be done from a
3rd party.
You can still use a Windows installation in a virtual machine.
Oliver
Eur van Andel wrote:
>>> Because I use a MAC there are NO GERBER viewers available. ( that I know of
>
>Me too. I have searched.
That's bad for the Mac users.
Nevertheless I think a Gerber viewer should be a separate application.
It's to check Eagle output, isn't it? So it should be done from a
3rd party.
You can still use a Windows installation in a virtual machine.
Oliver
Oliver Betz wrote on Tue, 13 July 2010 11:09
Eur van Andel wrote:
Nevertheless I think a Gerber viewer should be a separate application.
It's to check Eagle output, isn't it? So it should be done from a
3rd party.
You can still use a Windows installation in a virtual machine.
Oliver
Totally Totally Totally Agree re the 3rd party Gerber viewer.
I've used to use gerbv on mac, after installing fink, but forgot exactly
how I did it... fink was a bit of a pain. Really, it'd be nice if someone
posted a howto on the most straightforward way to get Gerbv working on a
mac.
--
Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca. Where the CadSoft EAGLE community meets.
faveluka wrote on Tue, 13 July 2010 12:36
Quote:
Nevertheless I think a Gerber viewer should be a separate
application. It's to check Eagle output, isn't it? So it should be
done from a 3rd party.
Totally Totally Totally Agree re the 3rd party Gerber viewer.
Me too.
There are plenty of Eagle enhancement I can think of that free third party
tools don't provide. A gerber viewer isn't one of them.
--
Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca. Where the CadSoft EAGLE community meets.
"Olin Lathrop" <eagle@embedinc.com> wrote in message
news:i1i5ji$sdp$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...
faveluka wrote on Tue, 13 July 2010 12:36
>> Quote:
>> > Nevertheless I think a Gerber viewer should be a separate
>> > application. It's to check Eagle output, isn't it? So it should be
>> > done from a 3rd party.
>>
>> Totally Totally Totally Agree re the 3rd party Gerber viewer.
>
Me too.
>
There are plenty of Eagle enhancement I can think of that free third party
tools don't provide. A gerber viewer isn't one of them.
--
do you use "print preview" option in printing dialog?!
We need such feature for gerber files too. It's the first feedback when you
generate the fabrication files.
Maybe CAM processor should display a preview for what will do, just to
confirme us that it's doing what we want CAM to do
eSilviu wrote on Wed, 14 July 2010 02:39
do you use "print preview" option in printing dialog?!
Not really, not from Eagle anyway.
Quote:
We need such feature for gerber files too.
So go to the Pentalogix site or one of the others and download a free
gerber viewer.
Quote:
It's the first feedback when you
generate the fabrication files.
Maybe CAM processor should display a preview for what will do, just to
confirme us that it's doing what we want CAM to do
There is no problem to solve here. I have never seen Eagle make a mistake
in writing out gerber files. I have occasionally made mistakes where I put
something in the wrong layer or wrote the wrong set of layers out to a
gerber file. Those errors are quite rare, so catching them when checking
the gerber files via a independent third party program is no problem. You
fix it, rerun the CAM job, and check again.
If you're frequently making these kinds of mistakes then you should take a
little time to learn the CAM processor better. Make a few canned CAM jobs
for the things you usually do. For example, I have canned CAM files for
two layer boards and 4 layer boards.
Another thing that helps me a lot is a checklist for going from a Eagle
board to a board house ZIP file. Yes, this is actually written down. I
refer to it every time I make a board house package. The checklist is
actually in the header comments of the script that helps automate binding
together all the relevant files into a board house ZIP file.
--
Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca. Where the CadSoft EAGLE community meets.
"Olin Lathrop" <eagle@embedinc.com> wrote in message
news:i1k7ec$62n$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...
eSilviu wrote on Wed, 14 July 2010 02:39
>> do you use "print preview" option in printing dialog?!
>
Not really, not from Eagle anyway.
>
Quote:
>> We need such feature for gerber files too.
>
So go to the Pentalogix site or one of the others and download a free
gerber viewer.
>
Quote:
>> It's the first feedback when you generate the fabrication files.
>> Maybe CAM processor should display a preview for what will do, just to
>>
>> confirme us that it's doing what we want CAM to do
>
There is no problem to solve here. I have never seen Eagle make a mistake
in writing out gerber files. I have occasionally made mistakes where I
put
something in the wrong layer or wrote the wrong set of layers out to a
gerber file. Those errors are quite rare, so catching them when checking
the gerber files via a independent third party program is no problem. You
fix it, rerun the CAM job, and check again.
>
If you're frequently making these kinds of mistakes then you should take a
little time to learn the CAM processor better. Make a few canned CAM jobs
for the things you usually do. For example, I have canned CAM files for
two layer boards and 4 layer boards.
>
Another thing that helps me a lot is a checklist for going from a Eagle
board to a board house ZIP file. Yes, this is actually written down. I
refer to it every time I make a board house package. The checklist is
actually in the header comments of the script that helps automate binding
together all the relevant files into a board house ZIP file.
>
--
Web access to CadSoft support forums at www.eaglecentral.ca. Where the
CadSoft EAGLE community meets.
I will request, only for you, a command line only version of Eagle, with no
GUI at all. Since you don't need visual feedback for your actions, you don't
need the GUI anyway. You could output the board as image, and see-it with
Paint if you need to see the final result