Just mailed two designs to Eurocircuits this afternoon made by Eagle V6.
Received a reject as 'does not look to be a valid .brd file'.
I wonder if they know about the changes in V6?
Robert
Just mailed two designs to Eurocircuits this afternoon made by Eagle V6.
Received a reject as 'does not look to be a valid .brd file'.
I wonder if they know about the changes in V6?
Robert
On 14/01/2012 17:44, Olin Lathrop wrote:
Robert wrote on Sat, 14 January 2012 11:33
>> I see that layer 3 (in Eagle), which became .L15 in the Gerber files,
>> was completely wrong, no wiring. This is probably because the quad
>> layer
>> board was defined in Eagle as (123*16).
That sounds like you used layers 1, 2, 3 and 16, but wrote out layers 1, 2,
15, and 16. I always use consecutive layers from one except that the
bottom layer is 16 to avoid any confusion. Still, that should have been
easily spotted when previewing the gerber files, so I still don't see how
that could have happened.
Well, I simply ran the gerb274x-4layer.cam job. It generates tabs for
the internal layers .ly2 and .l15 with above Eagle layer definition. No
idea that that was wrong. Will investigate.
Robert
On 14/01/2012 17:44, Olin Lathrop wrote:
Robert wrote on Sat, 14 January 2012 11:33
>> I see that layer 3 (in Eagle), which became .L15 in the Gerber files,
>> was completely wrong, no wiring. This is probably because the quad
>> layer
>> board was defined in Eagle as (123*16).
That sounds like you used layers 1, 2, 3 and 16, but wrote out layers 1, 2,
15, and 16. I always use consecutive layers from one except that the
bottom layer is 16 to avoid any confusion. Still, that should have been
easily spotted when previewing the gerber files, so I still don't see how
that could have happened.
Well, I simply ran the gerb274x-4layer.cam job. It generates tabs for
the internal layers .ly2 and .l15 with above Eagle layer definition. No
idea that that was wrong. Will investigate.
Robert