element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
    About the element14 Community
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      •  Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Support (English) Via diameter size control
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Subscribers 188 subscribers
  • Views 421 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Via diameter size control

rtzaudio
rtzaudio over 14 years ago

The global sizing of via diameters in the DRC just doesn't cut it for

hi-tech BGA stuff. We need a way to override the DRC for both under and

over the DRC limit vias. Once you move to high density fine pitch BGA's,

via size control becomes a real problem.

 

I understand how "auto" via size parameter works, but for things like

"via in pad" and "micro vias" and stacked micro vias, the current

implementation for controlling via diameters is just not suitable.

 

While the global DRC auto size and parameters works for the majority of

vias on a board, often I need to specify smaller annular rings in the

BGA field than I would from all other vias on the board.

 

Sure, I could set the DRC parameter to smallest ring I need in the BGA

area, but then I'd have to manually specify the diameter of every other

via outside my BGA area as larger - what a pain!

 

The via size parameter needs to fully respect the value given if the

diameter specified is not auto and smaller than the DRC limit. Maybe the

diameter could be specified negative or something, but we need a way to

override this "auto" minimum size feature.

 

This has been killing me for a long time and causes great pains routing

these high density BGA's. Please give use a way to control the via

diameters completely at the via level!

 

Bob

 

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • e14 Contributor
    e14 Contributor over 14 years ago

    Bob Starr wrote:

    The global sizing of via diameters in the DRC just doesn't cut it for

    hi-tech BGA stuff. We need a way to override the DRC for both under

    and over the DRC limit vias. Once you move to high density fine pitch

    BGA's, via size control becomes a real problem.

     

    I understand how "auto" via size parameter works, but for things like

    "via in pad" and "micro vias" and stacked micro vias, the current

    implementation for controlling via diameters is just not suitable.

     

    While the global DRC auto size and parameters works for the majority

    of vias on a board, often I need to specify smaller annular rings in

    the BGA field than I would from all other vias on the board.

     

    Sure, I could set the DRC parameter to smallest ring I need in the BGA

    area, but then I'd have to manually specify the diameter of every

    other via outside my BGA area as larger - what a pain!

     

    The via size parameter needs to fully respect the value given if the

    diameter specified is not auto and smaller than the DRC limit. Maybe

    the diameter could be specified negative or something, but we need a

    way to override this "auto" minimum size feature.

     

    This has been killing me for a long time and causes great pains

    routing these high density BGA's. Please give use a way to control

    the via diameters completely at the via level!

     

    Bob

     

     

    I agree.

    There are other inate Eagle features that are now impacted by  the scale of

    the modern componentry. They have been highlighted over the months.

     

    A similar issue to Bob's request, and needs to be addressed at the same

    time,  is  the ability to specify a hole that the copper does not stay clear

    of.

    A raw 'Drill' that can be part of a package or placed on the Board.

    Said another way, a Hole that is not reflected in the Dimension layer but is

    in the Drill layer.

     

     

    Warren

     

    --

    Viewed / responded via the newsgroup at

    news.cadsoft.de

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube