Consistency error. ERC check points to a non-existing part

On 11/03/2017 9:20 p.m., Tor-Arne Forsmo wrote:

"Different connection on K102 pin P and pad COM (none/N$48) it says, it's one among many. K102 is not part neither on the schematic nor on the board, If I try to search for it I find nothing. N$48 is on component K10 so where does K102 come from and how do I fix this?

 

--

To view any images and attachments in this post, visit:

https://www.element14.com/community/message/218161

 

Hi

Thanks for posting the Sch and Brd files.

I think you have found a bug. I see you are using v8.0.1

If Jorge is reading this, please check the files the OP posted.

I checked out your files using v7.7  and I see K102 as well in the error

list and yet there is no K102 nor in the XML

That K102 appears to be a poorly described gate 2 of K10

There are many example there in the files you posted

As is normally the case with lost forward/backward annotation (Lost

consistency) you likely made changes in the schematic without having the

board open at that time.  Always have both open as you perform edits.

One problem is the COM pads of the relays on the board. I feel at one

time the schematic had nets and then they were removed with the board

not open. The pads have contact references on them but that signal goes

nowhere else.

The simplest fix was to connect all the NO pins and that X5-1 pin with

N$97 and then with the board open, delete all the N$97 net connections

and board then dropped the reference to that net on all those pins.

Hence all those errors disappeared.

The other pins all had different nets so to do the job quickly I edited

the XML for the board. They stood out because they were signals with a

single Contact Ref to a COM pad.

Long story short, I have corrected the inconsistencies in your BRD file

so you should be good to go.

You will likely have to pick it up from

http://www.eaglecentral.ca/index.php/f/36/82ebb8ae529a7d06eea5d20bcc1b1ba4/

as E14 cannot pick up attachments from the newsgroup forum that E14

piggy backs onto.

All the best

Warren

--

... use NNTP://news.cadsoft.de and a functional news reader like

Thunderbird!

... or http://www.eaglecentral.ca browser access to CadSoft EAGLE

support forums.

Am 12.03.2017 um 09:34 schrieb warrenbrayshaw:

On 11/03/2017 9:20 p.m., Tor-Arne Forsmo wrote:

"Different connection on K102 pin P and pad COM (none/N$48) it says,

it's one among many. K102 is not part neither on the schematic nor on

the board, If I try to search for it I find nothing. N$48 is on

component K10 so where does K102 come from and how do I fix this?

 

--

To view any images and attachments in this post, visit:

https://www.element14.com/community/message/218161

 

 

Hi

Thanks for posting the Sch and Brd files.

 

I think you have found a bug. I see you are using v8.0.1

If Jorge is reading this, please check the files the OP posted.

 

I checked out your files using v7.7  and I see K102 as well in the error

list and yet there is no K102 nor in the XML

That K102 appears to be a poorly described gate 2 of K10

There are many example there in the files you posted

 

As is normally the case with lost forward/backward annotation (Lost

consistency) you likely made changes in the schematic without having the

board open at that time.  Always have both open as you perform edits.

 

One problem is the COM pads of the relays on the board. I feel at one

time the schematic had nets and then they were removed with the board

not open. The pads have contact references on them but that signal goes

nowhere else.

 

The simplest fix was to connect all the NO pins and that X5-1 pin with

N$97 and then with the board open, delete all the N$97 net connections

and board then dropped the reference to that net on all those pins.

Hence all those errors disappeared.

 

The other pins all had different nets so to do the job quickly I edited

the XML for the board. They stood out because they were signals with a

single Contact Ref to a COM pad.

 

 

Long story short, I have corrected the inconsistencies in your BRD file

so you should be good to go.

 

You will likely have to pick it up from

http://www.eaglecentral.ca/index.php/f/36/82ebb8ae529a7d06eea5d20bcc1b1ba4/

as E14 cannot pick up attachments from the newsgroup forum that E14

piggy backs onto.

 

All the best

Warren

 

 

 

Yes there is a fault in the library with different names for the Contact

pads in symbol and device.

--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With best regards

Joern Paschedag

Wow, I'm really grateful for that Thank you

Wow, I'm really grateful for that Thank you