how to solve this error for UBL tool in windows 8.1 pro

how to solve the above error.

Is that with a USB-UART serial cable direct to the EVAL board bypassing the Landungsbruecke board ?

Is the UART cable still using COM3 and showing up ok in Device Manager ? 

Is your UART set at the correct BAUD rate etc for the EVAL board ? 

Is Tx/Rx wired the correct way around ? Tx -> Rx / Rx <- Tx 

I am using the microcontroller board that is provided by the TMC-9660-3PH-EVAL to perform that operation. I don't have USB to UART serial cable.

"I'm guessing that up until now that has been 5V from the USB via the Landungsbruecke interface ?"

No. This is doing the selection on the TMC9660 board for the +VCC_IO

So it comes set for +3V3, derived from the internal buck if the motor supply is there, or +3V3 derived from the USB supply from the application processor board if not. (There's a linear regulator on the TMC9660 board to take the +5_USB down to +3.3V_USB.)

You've already done that back here:

https://community.element14.com/products/roadtest/f/forum/56322/how-to-solve-this-error-for-ubl-tool-in-windows-8-1-pro/231436

The problem is that it appears to be getting an unrecognised response back when it is expecting the device ID value.

You could perhaps try the standard fault-finding stuff like:

• snoop the COM port to see what data is being sent/received
• check any driver configuration settings on the virtual COM port in Device Manager
• look at the Python code to see what it is doing where the error occurs
• try rolling back, the PyTrimamic code example used ubltools_1.0.1
• try re-flashing the firmware
• try rolling back the firmware
• try getting it up-and-running on an up-to-date and supported OS first 

I'm guessing that up until now that has been 5V from the USB via the Landungsbruecke interface ?

How to do it using the microcontroller board provided from TMC-9660-3PH-EVAL using python wrapper.

beacon_dave said:

probably easier with an UNO

If the TMC-9600 is powered by 3.3V, then the MKR would be the safer choice. In that case, max voltage on the IO pins is 3.6V. A UNO sends 5V.

It's probably easier with an UNO but perhaps take a look at the Multiple Serial Example in the Arduino language reference. 

Hint: you will probably want to use the .write() function rather than the .print() function shown in the example.

Yes, I have arduino mkr wifi 1010. will it work.

Yes, I have arduino mkr wifi 1010. will it work.

"I'm guessing that up until now that has been 5V from the USB via the Landungsbruecke interface ?"

No. This is doing the selection on the TMC9660 board for the +VCC_IO

So it comes set for +3V3, derived from the internal buck if the motor supply is there, or +3V3 derived from the USB supply from the application processor board if not. (There's a linear regulator on the TMC9660 board to take the +5_USB down to +3.3V_USB.)

I'm guessing that up until now that has been 5V from the USB via the Landungsbruecke interface ?

beacon_dave said:

probably easier with an UNO

If the TMC-9600 is powered by 3.3V, then the MKR would be the safer choice. In that case, max voltage on the IO pins is 3.6V. A UNO sends 5V.

It's probably easier with an UNO but perhaps take a look at the Multiple Serial Example in the Arduino language reference. 

Hint: you will probably want to use the .write() function rather than the .print() function shown in the example.