element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Test & Tools
  • Technologies
  • More
Test & Tools
Blog Building a Measurement Amplifier
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Test & Tools requires membership for participation - click to join
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: shabaz
  • Date Created: 21 Sep 2020 4:48 PM Date Created
  • Views 7793 views
  • Likes 12 likes
  • Comments 36 comments
  • opa1611
  • measurement amplifier
  • noise measurement
  • lab amplifier
  • test amplifier
Related
Recommended

Building a Measurement Amplifier

shabaz
shabaz
21 Sep 2020

  • Introduction
  • What is a Measurement Amplifier?
  • Amplifier Circuit
  • Building It
  • Amplifier Noise
  • Frequency Response
  • Building Revision 2.0
  • Summary

 

 

Note: This blog post is now historical, there is a more improved version of the Measurement Amplifier here: Viewing Noise with a Measurement Amplifier

The blog post content below still has some hopefully useful information, and the comments at the bottom are important for explaining the evolution from this blog post to the new improved measurement amplifier.

 

Introduction

This blog post discusses an experimental, simple low-noise amplifier project. The amplifier can be used to enlarge tiny signals from sensors, for example for science experiments. Another use-case would be to observe noise on a DC level (for instance power supply noise), or for capturing data for post-processing.

 

The output can be connected to existing test and measurement equipment such as a multimeter or an oscilloscope or data recorder.

 

I have found it useful to measure the noise on DC power rails, by connecting the input BNC connector to the power rail, and connecting the output BNC connector to a multimeter set to measure AC volts, and then reading off the RMS value, and dividing by the gain of the amplifier (200). There's more information about that further below, and users will need to confirm their multimeter can measure AC voltages across their desired frequency band.

 

This project came about because I needed an amplifier for a few measurements to test other test equipment!, and I happened to have a printed circuit board that I had originally intended for use as a microphone amplifier. I decided to use the PCB to create a measurement amplifier instead.

image

 

What is a Measurement Amplifier?

I don't know if the terminology is correct or not, it doesn't seem to be a popular term. Maybe 'General-purpose Amplifier' is a simpler and better term! It is an amplifier intended to be used as a piece of test equipment. Some commercial test amplifiers have configurable amplification and filter settings on the front panel. The amplifier described in this blog post however is very simple and does not have any configurability. Part of the reason for that is because I decided to reuse a PCB from a different project. I decided a possibly achievable goal with the PCB I had was to attempt to build an amplifier usable from 1 Hz to 100 kHz, so that it could be connected to slow-changing and (fairly) fast-changing sensor signals, with a gain of 200. There are no gain or attenuation settings for this project, and so there is an input level limit before the output will clip.

 

Amplifier Circuit

The design is basically just a single OPA1611 op-ampOPA1611 op-amp circuit. The input signal has its DC offset removed by the input capacitor, and then a non-inverting amplifier is used with a gain of 201. The components marked ‘DNF’ are not used, but could be useful if the design is ever modified. The output is connected to a capacitor to remove any output offset. Although there is a 50 ohm resistor at the output when connecting to an oscilloscope the usual 1 Mohm probe channel input setting can be used. The button at the output is used to rapidly discharge the output capacitor so that less time is spent waiting for things to settle when a connection is made.

 

The circuit is powered from two 9V batteries.

image

There is some input protection, but I didn’t test beyond 30V, since I didn’t have any spare op-amps if things went wrong. I connected the input BNC to a 30V DC supply to examine its noise.

 

Building It

The construction is straightforward. Although massive film capacitorsmassive film capacitors were used for the input and output, there are also smaller footprints on the PCB for lower-cost electrolytic capacitors if desired. However, the film capacitors are not prohibitively expensive (they are just a few pounds/dollars). I went with film capacitors in case I ever want to explore low distortion measurements. The design is intended to slide into a standard-sized extruded aluminium enclosure, Hammond 1455T1601Hammond 1455T1601 (it comes in lots of different color options to suit your lab : ). I used Polydoh to hold the 9V battery snaps in a position to kind-of act as a custom battery holder.

image

 

One problem with aluminium extruded enclosures is that they can be heavily anodized and difficult to connect to the 0V connection to act as a screen. The only solution I know of is to drill, sand, or grind off the insulating anodization and use a nut, bolt, star washer, and ring tag to make electrical connections to each piece of the enclosure. Steel enclosures would not have this problem, but they are harder to drill.

 

A benefit of this enclosure is that if there is no equipment to drill holes for the aluminium front panel plate, then the plate could be replaced with a printed circuit board design, i.e. leave the connector and switch hole-making problem to the PCB manufacturer.

 

Incidentally the Hammond enclosure comes with a couple of plastic bezels; they were thrown away because they create a small unshielded gap between the end panels and the body of the enclosure.

 

Amplifier Noise

To measure the noise of the amplifier, I connected a 50-ohm terminator50-ohm terminator on the input and then captured the output using an oscilloscope set to 1 Mohm input. I captured at 1 Msample/sec. The ‘scope showed that the peak-to-peak noise was 5.5mV, and RMS noise was 0.5mV as shown in the screenshot below.

image

 

The 1 Msps capture CSV file of the data is attached to the blog post, in case any further analysis needs to be done by anyone. Here is a plot of the spectrum of the noise from that 1 Msps capture; the black line is a smoothed curve. As can be seen, at low frequencies there is higher noise.

image

 

The amplitude of the output noise on the oscilloscope will appear different depending on the sample rate. Filtering the output will also make a difference of course. The chart below shows the effect on the output noise (in millivolts RMS and millivolts peak-to-peak) if the output is filtered to remove high frequencies. It can be seen that (say) filtering at 100kHz will result in 0.36 mV RMS noise (3.1 mV p-p).

image

 

Frequency Response

To measure the frequency response, the amplifier was connected to an AFG 31000AFG 31000 waveform generator set to sine-wave mode, 10mV peak-to-peak. Since waveform generators are designed for 50-ohm impedance and the amplifier has a much higher impedance (22 kohm), the amplifier will see a signal input of 20 mVp-p. Multiplied by 201, the output should be 4Vp-p or 1.42V RMS.

 

For accurate RMS measurement, the output was connected to a multimeter (U1282AU1282A) and the waveform generator was stepped from 10 Hz to 110 kHz. I didn’t measure below 10 Hz because the multimeter is not designed for less than 20 Hz. At 10 Hz the multimeter response does drops slightly, but I considered it usable. As can be seen, the U1282AU1282A report the output as flat across 10 Hz to 100kHz, easily to within 1%.

image

 

For frequencies lower than 10 Hz, I took less accurate measurements using an oscilloscope and noticed that at 1 Hz, the frequency response had dropped by 1.5 dB (i.e. the response was 85% of what would be expected from a flat response). This isn’t great but is still usable provided it is known that the response behaves in this way at 1 Hz. It can be corrected by adding an additional capacitor – that’s something for revision 2.0!

 

Building Revision 2.0

The entire content above shows the version 1.0 design, hacked-together with a PCB originally intended to be a microphone amplifier. I figured I’d modify the PCB layout to modify the amplifier circuit so that if anyone else decides to build it, then there are two stages of amplification for a more sensible design. The revision 2.0 zip files are attached, ready for sending to a PCB factory. If desired, just one stage of amplification can be built just like the 1.0 design, and the second stage can be bypassed with a wire link.

 

This is the circuit for the two stages:

image

 

As can be seen, it just consists of two near-identical stages, and the user can experiment with the gain settings or op-amp, by changing component values. I also took the opportunity to add more capacitors in parallel at the input stage, to further improve the low-frequency response if desired. It should be flat to 1 Hz if two 12uF input capacitors (C5 and C17) are populated.

 

The revision 2.0 board also contains a low-battery indicator:

image

 

The revision 2.0 PCB layout allows for easier construction, there are no signal connectors on flying leads; the BNC connectors are PCB mounted. Alongside a PCB-mounted zeroise button, there are two unallocated buttons that can be optionally used for future upgrades such as gain selection or for enabling/disabling a filter. To that end, there is also a proto-board area on the PCB for through-hole components and one surface-mount SOIC device such as an op-amp. It is for any enhancements that users may wish to experiment with. Wires can be easily patched from the op-amp to the proto area. Perhaps a revision 3.0 board could include the best enhancements.

image

 

Summary

This simple measurement amplifier allows the user to explore the noise on power supply rails, or to examine tiny signals from sensors. The revision 1.0 design has proved itself to be useful for checking power supplies (I have tested up to 30V) using either an oscilloscope or a multimeter, or even a computer sound card, attached to the output of the amplifier. The revision 2.0 design files attached to the blog post should provide for a more expanded and easier-to-assemble design, and it is hoped that people could implement additional functionality. If you do have any ideas, please share them!

 

See the links below for the version 2.0 PCB Gerber files, bill-of-materials, and version 1.0 example oscilloscope capture data.

Thanks for reading!

Attachments:
export-gerber-files-measurement-amp-rev2.zip
imagemeas-amp-bill-materials-pcb-rev-2-0.pdf
meas-amp-rev1-data-capture-noise.zip
  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • jw0752
    jw0752 over 4 years ago +4
    Hi Shabaz, This looks like a very useful bench tool. Thank you for sharing the design with us. Now I have a new project to work on for a few days. John
  • Jan Cumps
    Jan Cumps over 4 years ago +4
    A little signal amplifier is a great lab tool. Thanks for the design. The microcurrent gizmo that I use to measure low currents, has a similar approach, a two-stage x100 amplifier. That one doesn't use…
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago in reply to jw0752 +4
    Hi John and Jan, That's a nice feature, as you say there's value in having DC capability too. One of the unallocated DPDT switches could be used to switch in/out the input and output capacitors. There…
Parents
  • jw0752
    jw0752 over 4 years ago

    Hi Shabaz,

     

    Does it make any sense to put in switchable shunts on the input and output caps so that it could also serve in situations where DC amplification is needed? I needed something similar the other day when I was working with a pressure sensor. In my case a signal amplifier would not do as it had to be a DC amplification. I see that Jan mentioned something similar.

     

    John

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago in reply to jw0752

    Hi John and Jan,

     

    That's a nice feature, as you say there's value in having DC capability too. One of the unallocated DPDT switches could be used to switch in/out the input and output capacitors.

    There may be an offset, which might need to be nulled.

    Maybe something like this could work (everything above the dashed line is the schematic described in the blog post, and the circuit below the dashed line would be new).

    image

    If you like, I could add this circuit into the PCB, so it could be tried out. It's a small addition, and allows for more experimentation.

    It would also be nice to be able to switch in/out one of the stages, to reduce the gain perhaps. I'm wondering if a reed relay should be used, to save having to route the signals toward the front panel area maybe. Another improvement could be to move the output capacitor further up the PCB, to make space for a smaller PCB to be placed on top near the front panel area, for more connections in future, since that front area of the board is busy with lots of buttons and the connectors.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago in reply to jw0752

    Hi John and Jan,

     

    That's a nice feature, as you say there's value in having DC capability too. One of the unallocated DPDT switches could be used to switch in/out the input and output capacitors.

    There may be an offset, which might need to be nulled.

    Maybe something like this could work (everything above the dashed line is the schematic described in the blog post, and the circuit below the dashed line would be new).

    image

    If you like, I could add this circuit into the PCB, so it could be tried out. It's a small addition, and allows for more experimentation.

    It would also be nice to be able to switch in/out one of the stages, to reduce the gain perhaps. I'm wondering if a reed relay should be used, to save having to route the signals toward the front panel area maybe. Another improvement could be to move the output capacitor further up the PCB, to make space for a smaller PCB to be placed on top near the front panel area, for more connections in future, since that front area of the board is busy with lots of buttons and the connectors.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +4 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
  • jw0752
    jw0752 over 4 years ago in reply to shabaz

    At least on the input I suspect that running wires to the front panel might be counter productive. Perhaps even separate relays would be indicated as bringing the output of the unit within the distance of the contacts in a single micro relay might add an undesirable capacitive effect between output and input. Actually participating in this discussion with you and Jan makes me feel like a 5 year old that interrupts the adults during a discussion to make an observation. It is fun to learn from you guys.

     

    Thanks John

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • shabaz
    shabaz over 4 years ago in reply to jw0752

    Hi John,

     

    This is a good idea, I already have the component pattern for a reed relay in EAGLE, so it would be a quick modification to attach the relay to the input side, so that is kept far apart from the output.

    I love your home-constructed test equipment and so I know you'll spot plenty of things, and your experiments are diverse so you'll come up with a dozen useful new features I bet if you run with it : ) Also this circuit is experimental so you'll be able to adapt it to make it function way better than the current prototype.

    I'll wait a week or two and see what comes out of your mind : ) and then maybe a revision 3 PCB design can be attempted.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • jw0752
    jw0752 over 4 years ago in reply to shabaz

    Thanks Shabaz,

    I have put some of the OPA1611 ICs on my next order. I also ordered a couple OPA1612 which have dual OP Amps. I do not have the LM2904 but I have an LM358 which is a perfect substitute. In your last schematic I must have missed something. Is the section below the line a gain control on the second amplifier section? If not you will have to clue me into what it does. I love your creative projects.

     

    John

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
  • jw0752
    jw0752 over 4 years ago in reply to shabaz

    When I copied the picture its name gave me a clue. It is the Offset control that you talked about. Very cool.

     

    John

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube