element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • About Us
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Personal Blogs
  • Community Hub
  • More
Personal Blogs
John Wiltrout's Blog Playing with an OP 191 Op Amp
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Group Actions
  • Group RSS
  • More
  • Cancel
Engagement
  • Author Author: jw0752
  • Date Created: 22 Jan 2016 7:42 AM Date Created
  • Views 2266 views
  • Likes 5 likes
  • Comments 12 comments
  • op191_op_amp
Related
Recommended

Playing with an OP 191 Op Amp

jw0752
jw0752
22 Jan 2016

One of the really great things about the E-14 Web Site is how much one can learn just by reading and paying attention to some of the threads. On Jan 9th michaelkellett posted information on the OP191 and OP192 Op Amps which he likes to use in his designs. Being curious to play with them for myself I marked down the number and ordered some of the OP 191 for my shop. The OP191s that I received were in the SOIC8 package so it was necessary to mount it on an adapter board so that I could conduct some simple experiments on the bread boards. Here is the OP191 after I mounted it on the adapter and turned it into a DIP8.


image


I next built a simple circuit with a gain of 10 and used my wave form generator and my oscilloscope to look at the limits of the chip and how well it performed. Here is the simple circuit.


image


I used a +/- 10 volt supply for the chip and I ran the input level down until I could no longer get good readings on my scope. I was very impressed with how well the OP191 worked. Actually it doesn't take that much to impress me or to cover my needs. I could have taken michaelkellett 's word for it but what would have been the fun in that? The Op Amp did a very good job reproducing sine, square, and ramp inputs.


Here are the readouts of the test equipment during one of the experiments on the Op Amp.


image

 

image

image


Thanks again to MK for the excellent recommendation and all the fun I had tonight playing with the OP191. It will be fun to use it in my next build that requires this level of Rail to Rail Op Amp. If you want to read MK's original post it is in this thread


Power Supply for Home lab?

by mudz


John.

  • Sign in to reply

Top Comments

  • michaelkellett
    michaelkellett over 9 years ago +2
    I'm glad it's working well - I've just finished the design of a board for a client with 9 OPA192s on it - the bare boards should be here on Tuesday so I'll post some pictures (and a some bits of circuit…
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 9 years ago in reply to jw0752 +2
    I glossed over it in my post, but there are two main effects that roll off the response at higher frequencies. One is the decline in the open loop gain, the other is the slew-rate limitation of the output…
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 9 years ago in reply to jw0752 +2
    Your roll-off is much earlier than the datasheet would suggest (Figure 15). It's a bit difficult to read, but at a closed-loop gain = -10 their graph shows the actual gain falling by half (-6dB down) at…
Parents
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 9 years ago

    Ah, the website is back and working.

     

    I'm having great fun with this simulation stuff. Another circuit you might want to try is an "ideal diode". You often used to see this circuit on old op-amp datasheets - particularly the wonderful ones that Nat Semi put out with dozens of circuits on them - but I've never had a use for it in real life.

     

    Here's the circuit

    image

     

    here are the waveforms for a 5kHz sine wave going in

     

    image

     

     

    Although it is far superior to the 1N4148 by itself, it's not quite perfect. The small step on the output as the input cuts 0V on the way up is where the opamp output has to suddenly move from close to the -12V rail to the 0.6V it needs to forward bias the diode and start lifting the output. That change is limited by the slew rate of the amplifier output.

     

    This shows that point in more detail (green is the input, red is the output)

     

    image

    The datasheet gives the slew rate as 7V/uS typical (rising), so that suggests 1.8uS for the -12V to 0.6v transition plus a bit of settling time. The simulation is about 3uS, so it looks like the model is safely worst-case and you'd see something faster than that if you measured it (which you should be able to do easily if you look at the input and output on a scope and place them on top of each other). It's encouraging that the TI model seems to be this detailed.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Comment
  • jc2048
    jc2048 over 9 years ago

    Ah, the website is back and working.

     

    I'm having great fun with this simulation stuff. Another circuit you might want to try is an "ideal diode". You often used to see this circuit on old op-amp datasheets - particularly the wonderful ones that Nat Semi put out with dozens of circuits on them - but I've never had a use for it in real life.

     

    Here's the circuit

    image

     

    here are the waveforms for a 5kHz sine wave going in

     

    image

     

     

    Although it is far superior to the 1N4148 by itself, it's not quite perfect. The small step on the output as the input cuts 0V on the way up is where the opamp output has to suddenly move from close to the -12V rail to the 0.6V it needs to forward bias the diode and start lifting the output. That change is limited by the slew rate of the amplifier output.

     

    This shows that point in more detail (green is the input, red is the output)

     

    image

    The datasheet gives the slew rate as 7V/uS typical (rising), so that suggests 1.8uS for the -12V to 0.6v transition plus a bit of settling time. The simulation is about 3uS, so it looks like the model is safely worst-case and you'd see something faster than that if you measured it (which you should be able to do easily if you look at the input and output on a scope and place them on top of each other). It's encouraging that the TI model seems to be this detailed.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • More
    • Cancel
Children
No Data
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube