Another manufacturer for BBB

Looks like a price increase is happening:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user/64166

Since it seems to be aimed at getting more manufacturers involved in order to increase supply, I'm surprised that e14 isn't using the embest one for this.

Still, a price increase is dubious at best. The BBB is already more expensive than the more capable OLinuXino-LIME and it won't take much to push it into head to head competition with e14's RIoT board.

Looks like we might be getting the Embest one outside China after all, noticed this the other day

Mfg is e14, country of origin China and unfortunately includes the previously mentioned price increase

The RIoT board is £46.55 here in the UK, it has twice the RAM, twice the eMMC, gigabit network, four usb, audio connectors, better CPU, better GPU... the list goes on of ways it offers more than the BBB.  So while I'm sure there will be a certain amount of RPi effect where people will choose the BBB simply because it's a BBB, personally I don't think it'll be quite so simple a choice. 

The BBB is really good at the original price, but it's competing against a different set of boards at this price.

Price has been updated on the Embest version:

So it now matches the CircuitCo version.

There's also this http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.beagleboard.user/64767 from Gerald that suggests a move to 4GB eMMC sometime soon.

This looks like the product page for North America:

BBONE-BLACK - EMBEST BBONE-BLACK - DEV BOARD, AM3358 MPU | Newark element14 US

Gerald's update on the wiki is interesting:

Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack - eLinux.org

Interesting.. I suspect the Newark stock will be short lived now that you've pointed it out

I'm curious what e14/embest will do when the CircuitCo rev C arrives.  If they can continue to offer their version at $45 with 2GB eMMC it might take the pressure off.. Or do they match price/features with the CircuitCo version?

I hope it will track fairly closely as new revisions come out, since the Embest BeagleBone Black is part of the BeagleBoard.org Logo program: BeagleBoard.org - logo

That comment on the wiki about eMMC wearing out....  people talking about wear levelling and worrying about lifetimes should go and read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write_amplification While that page is written with SSD's in mind, the principles are similar for any sort of flash memory wear levelling and things like eMMC and uSD possibly may not have the equivalent of TRIM.

Drew Fustini wrote:

 

since the Embest BeagleBone Black is part of the BeagleBoard.org Logo program

That's interesting as the only photos of the embest version I've seen don't have the logo..

I already had my credit card out from backing the Novena: Open Source Hardware laptop , so I just ordered the BBONE-BLACK - EMBEST BBONE-BLACK - DEV BOARD, AM3358 MPU | Newark element14 US.  I'll post a photo when I get it.

fyi - photo from @beagleboardorg on twitter from Newark element14 booth at EELive.  Thanks jkridner!

https://twitter.com/beagleboardorg/status/451792077177618432

Pity that e14 didn't choose some different colour of LEDs

Hehe, should be blue and orange bi color LEDs per our design guidelines

jkridner just posted a pic of the element14 BeagleBone Black box!

https://twitter.com/beagleboardorg/status/451800453085270016

Still processing that I work for a company that makes an Open Source Hardware Linux computer!!!

Hehe, should be blue and orange bi color LEDs per our design guidelines

jkridner just posted a pic of the element14 BeagleBone Black box!

https://twitter.com/beagleboardorg/status/451800453085270016

Still processing that I work for a company that makes an Open Source Hardware Linux computer!!!

The RIoTboard is supposed to be open source too...

Ah, good point... I'll qualify with Open Source Hardware Linux computer with cute mascot and commitment to mainline kernel

I have to say that I'm surprised at the seeming lack of interest in mainline linux support for RIoT.  It would seem to make commercial sense to open up the platform to a wider audience, and they're bound to understand how well these could sell given their involvement with RPi & BBB.  As e14 is in full control of the platform it seems odd that they don't seem to want to take advantage of the BBB supply shortage with their own board and are instead going with a BBB clone.

selsinork: I think BeagleBone has an advantage as the BeagleBoard started in 2008 as a way to get more Linux developers working on ARM.  They seem to have carried the interest of kernel hackers on to present day.  The impression I get from other boards with impressive specs is they often lack that critical mass of developers.  BeagleBoard.org community seems to make a consistent effort to work with the kernel maintainers.  I imagine this can be difficult to learn for other projects/boards.

I'm really excited to be going to San Jose in a few weeks for the 10th annual Embedded Linux Conference... my first!  I figure I'll more about how all of this works and the relationships between chip makers, board makers, kernel maintainers and community projects.

Freescale have made a big effort with the i.MX6 though, that's visible in the support that Sabre-Lite, Wandboard, UDOO and a host of other i.MX6 boards are benefiting from. So much so that virtually everything on the RIoT (and MarS) are already supportable. Like with Beagleboard, all it really takes is a bit of interest from the manufacturer (e14 in this case) to bring things together. Once that's done, you'd be surprised at how easy it'll be to maintain the momentum as it'll benefit from the work all of the other i.MX6 board manufacturers are doing.

There seems to be two cohesive communities that have critical mass these days, centered around the Freescale & Allwinner devices, and the interest seems to be largely due to there being lots of manufacturers using both SoC families.

The impression you get is that Beagleboard has Robert Nelson and that's it. Sure there are various TI employees doing bits of OMAP support but none of it looks particularly related to Beagleboard and things like the BBB's capemgr look like they'll never make it. Indeed it looks a lot like Beagleboard and mainline TI are completely orthogonal.

Either way, when the manufacturers show no interest at all then any community effort may be doomed to failure regardless.  Interesting then that when you look at arm devicetree support in current kernels it's probably Marvell that has the widest support...

Good to know - I'm glad that i.MX6 is doing well with support in general as I backed the Novena (iMX6 laptop).

Marvell, hmmm, that was used in a lot of the tiny ARM file servers like pogoplug, right?  Are there any OSHW SBCs you know that use it?

Yes, sheevaplug is the one I know the marvell stuff from. I think their chips are also used in various NAS type systems as well judging by the names.  Can't say I've seen any SBCs using them.

Looking at the dts files in arch/arm/boot/dts/ in the 3.13 kernel, out of 286 the top 3 are

followed by Samsung, Allwinner, Atmel, Nvidia all in the 10-20 range.  The Freescale number is interesting as there are lots of older imx2* boards while we're much more likely to be interested in imx53 or imx6 today.

The overall impression is that while there's lots of Arm devices, comparitively few are SBCs and even fewer OSHW.

Help... can't read this

Interesting that a BBB is now 'Exclusively from element14'

Yes,its really an AM3358..

<html><head><title>Jive SBS</title></head>
<body><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<b>Error</b><br><font size="-1">
An general error occurred while processing your request.
</font></font></body></html>

Spot the differences...

<html><head><title>Jive SBS</title></head>
<body><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<b>Error</b><br><font size="-1">
An general error occurred while processing your request.
</font></font></body></html>

<html><head><title>Jive SBS</title></head>
<body><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<b>Error</b><br><font size="-1">
An general error occurred while processing your request.
</font></font></body></html>

One interesting thing to note, and that's already been noticed in the beagleboard google group is that the e14 boards don't have the A5B, A5C, A6 etc marking, so we don't really know what version they are and what fixes are incorporated.

<html><head><title>Jive SBS</title></head>
<body><font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<b>Error</b><br><font size="-1">
An general error occurred while processing your request.
</font></font></body></html>

After some digging, it appears that my e14 board is a RevB, it has the R8/R9 fix from A6A and a AM3358 which appears to make it a RevB.

And TP9 seems to go to a previously unused pin on the AM335x. You've got an additional I/O pin, not that there was a shortage : )