element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Chat (English) open letter to Autodesk.
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 27 replies
  • Subscribers 177 subscribers
  • Views 2979 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

open letter to Autodesk.

autodeskguest
autodeskguest over 8 years ago

Dear Autodesk,

 

We are small company that have a license for EAGLE v7 and we

are quite happy using it.

It is excellent news that you have released version 8 and we

are excited with the prospects of innovations you may be delivering

for version 9, 10 ,11 etc in a future to come.

 

We understand that EAGLE now is available on subscription only,

that is fine with us. The only problem we see is that the fee value

for premium ver. 70euro/month seems quite wrong for our small company

business model.

 

We would like to see a monthly fee of 780 euro for using Eagle.

That really is much more realistic.

 

Our proposed terms are negotiable and we may drop amount that Autodesk

needs to pay us for the usage of Eagle quite a bit depending on some

licensing improvements Autodesk may do.

 

--

 

It is our understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) that Eagle projects

can only be opened in Eagle. Also Eagle only saves CAD files in Eagle

format.

So it is our understanding that we cannot use other software tools

to continue a work started in Eagle nor we can use anything else to view

Eagle files.

Therefore Autodesk will have the power to affect, impact or even disrupt our

work-flow and our design efforts (that cost us money).

Note this situation is totally different from MS-office or

Photoshop-Adobe or

even Autocad where files that can be worked out (almost) flawlessly in many

other software packages.

 

Our HDRM (hypothetical daily risk manager) (me) did a brief analysis of

our present

and past projects and calculated a monthly fee of about 850euro to cover

the risks

associated with granting a third party company the power to interfere

with our business.

 

We concluded that it does not matter if we are going to use Eagle a

little or a lot

or even if we did not used it at all for a period. As long as we want to

have the availability

to use it immediately (with or without Internet) when we so desire we

must keep paying a monthly or yearly subscription fee. to have the power

to use it.

Okay... sounds fair.

 

In the same way, it does not matter if Autodesk will use or not his power to

stop us from working on a project (either in the form of unintentional

unavailability

of license servers, or eventual loose of interest in Eagle and drop it,

or simply going out of business one day) as long as Autodest wants to

have that

disruptive interfering power in our small company should also be paying

us the

corresponding risk fee. If the previous sounds fair this one must sound

equally fair.

 

So the math is simple: 850(our risk)-70(eagle subs) = 780euro/month we are

willing to receive from Autodesk to start using Eagle 8 and newer.

We can depart from here as our position is fully negotiable image

 

We see quite ugly (to say the least) renting something that force us

to keep renting or otherwise face a retroactive loss.

Again I stress it is not fair since you don't view and edit Eagle files

elsewhere but in eagle.

Also not pretty to deny the common practice in long term projects

to backup all development environment and be able to recreate it later.

 

There is always a possibility to annoy all users by adding a powerful

"save-as/export" to solve this specific unfairness of your renting model

and stick to it...

 

I still see some other interesting options for Autodesk like adding the good

old perpetual license model,  or simply take a seat and watch us all

move elsewhere.

 

 

Yours faithfully.

 

Luis C.

 

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • clem57
    clem57 over 8 years ago +2
    I see a storm brewing here and elsewhere
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 8 years ago in reply to balearicdynamics +2
    Enrico Miglino schrieb: The way to port is something I am thinking too, as you can imagine. At the moment the only possible solution I see is through the Gerber export process, a format that can be imported…
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 8 years ago in reply to autodeskguest +2
    Joern Paschedag schrieb: Hi Klaus, apart from all this trouble it is nice to hear a (very short) word from you and I hope you are doing well That's exactly what I was about to write. Tilmann
Parents
  • techsupport
    techsupport over 8 years ago

    Hi Luis,

    Greatly appreciate reaching out to us on this Forum, I will do my best to take care as accurately as possible your questions.

    First, lets be clear, EAGLE design files are stored locally on your computer, EAGLE neither Autodesk have no access to this or stored them in some cryptic cloud. The only thing Autodesk EAGLE needs to access is your license which its validation which is on the cloud, everything else remains locally on your computer. 

    EAGLE files are stored in ASCII XML data structure, we also provide users with the .dtd documentation if you wish to understand how the file is structured. You can find the .dtd file in the EAGLE document folder.

     

    If for some reason you needed to go offline, EAGLE will remain fully operational for 14 days, before that you need to get online and allow to validate the license entitlement.

    If your subscription was to expire, EAGLE will remain working free mode, which allows you to open your designs you can also print, and export from it, including but not limited to, Gerber and Drill files for designs that exceed the free version limitation.

     

    The Autdoesk EAGLE development team are diligently and consistently working on adding many new features which will enhance your design experience.

    Why would Autodesk ever pull the servers or go out of business with EAGLE?  Autodesk is a well established company that intentionally would not jeopardize their hard earned reputation.  You can be assured if this was to ever happen, some sort of solution will be provided. 

     

    Best Regards,

    Ed

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 8 years ago in reply to techsupport

    Hi Ed,

     

    Thanks for coming back to my rumbling.

     

    First, lets be clear, EAGLE design files are stored locally on your computer, EAGLE neither Autodesk

    > have no access to this or stored them in some cryptic cloud. The only

    thing Autodesk EAGLE needs

    > to access is your license which its validation which is on the cloud,

    everything else remains locally on your computer.

     

    That was perfectly clear... I had no intention to suggest otherwise

    neither any of my comments presumed otherwise.

     

    EAGLE files are stored in ASCII XML data structure, we also provide users with the .dtd documentation

    >if you wish to understand how the file is structured. You can find the

    .dtd file in the EAGLE document folder.

     

    Indeed the guts of the file format is not really interesting for me to

    understand, sorry. Same applies to the .dwg files of autocad I have no

    interest also however they flawlessly work in nano-CAD, Draftsight,

    Rhinoceros etc.

     

    So please let me know a list of software packages where I can I can

    continue a design that I started in Eagle. Thanks. (maybe they exist...

    I don't know)

     

    If we have the freedom of renting, stop and continue in another

    software, then rental is fair.

    If we rent, start a project and then are forced to keep renting to the

    same company in order to finish the project, sorry but that is not fair.

    (In this part of the world mortgages/loans can be moved from one bank to

    another, if they could not be moved would empower a bank to rise the

    values and squeeze a poor man to the last cent). I don't know how to

    explain my point any better than this sorry, and this is my main

    objection to this compulsory subscription

    scheme.

     

    If for some reason you needed to go offline, EAGLE will remain fully operational for 14 days,

    > before that you need to get online and allow to validate the license

    entitlement.

    If your subscription was to expire, EAGLE will remain working free mode, which allows you

    > to open your designs you can also print, and export from it,

    including but not limited to,

    > Gerber and Drill files for designs that exceed the free version

    limitation.

     

    That is clear, and all fine. Sounds right and according to the model you

    want for Eagle.

    Don't see any problem here. I've read that before... all fine.

    The explanations you kindly gave here in this post and in earlier posts,

    we all appreciate, denote the difficulty you are having to understand

    the real issues that people are complaining about.

    There is an underlying problem you should take an effort to grasp, which

    is the modus-operandi of Eagle users. You may consider to resist the

    temptation of trying to educate

    everybody as it never worked out in the past.

     

    The Autdoesk EAGLE development team are diligently and consistently working on adding

    > many new features which will enhance your design experience.

     

    We would be happier if you add something that we want, the goal of any

    company

    is to please the customers... at least for my small one is.

     

    Why would Autodesk ever pull the servers or go out of business with EAGLE?

    I can't really tell, as we are out of crystal balls for the moment, but

    I'm sure you could come up with some ideas if I give you 6 months. About

    the same time span from "Eagle will not go subscription " until today

    image  One idea that comes to mind is that one day it may become

    financially uninteresting... who knows !

     

    Autodesk is a well established company that intentionally would not

    > jeopardize their hard earned reputation.

     

    I fully agree with the term "intentionally"

    ... these Eagle licensing issues are certainly not improving your

    reputation as I see it.

     

    It is clear that the decision was taken and Autodesk is going to stick to it

    so all I can say is that we will keep using ver 7.7 and will move to

    KiCad (or else) on

    the next big project that justifies the effort of moving.

     

    Thanks for your time.

     

    Luis C.

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • balearicdynamics
    balearicdynamics over 8 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    If we rent, start a project and then are forced to keep renting to the

    same company in order to finish the project, sorry but that is not fair.

    (In this part of the world mortgages/loans can be moved from one bank to

    another, if they could not be moved would empower a bank to rise the

    values and squeeze a poor man to the last cent). I don't know how to

    explain my point any better than this sorry, and this is my main

    objection to this compulsory subscription

    scheme.

    I sadly agree.

    In 2015 I got a 1 year free license from Element14 as part of the PiIoT Challenge kit, so I unexpectedly experienced the period renting product. During this licensing period I moved from version 6.x to 7 and all was fine. Then I decided to buy a 7 unlimited license but almost in the same period I starting reading the news about the Eagle products acquired by Autodesk so I wait. At the actual date, unfortunately I have stopped this move, jut for the cost respect the projects (some also commercial ones) I am working on.

     

    Indeed the guts of the file format is not really interesting for me to

    understand, sorry. Same applies to the .dwg files of autocad I have no

    interest also however they flawlessly work in nano-CAD, Draftsight,

    Rhinoceros etc.

     

    The way to port is something I am thinking too, as you can imagine. At the moment the only possible solution I see is through the Gerber export process, a format that can be imported in some other electronic CAD products.

     

    It is clear that the decision was taken and Autodesk is going to stick to it

    so all I can say is that we will keep using ver 7.7 and will move to

    KiCad (or else) on

    the next big project that justifies the effort of moving.

     

    I have tried to understand what can be the reason of this apparently illogic move.

    The only reason I can see is that after Autodesk put his hands on the Eagle package has already internally decided that the small and personal users are no longer interesting for the business model of the company. As a matter of fact the Autodesk business model applied to Eagle is something starting a process of natural selection, orienting the product to their core business without the need to explicitly declare this traumatic (for small users and small companies) decision as well sounds acceptable and reasonable for big customers.

     

    Enrico

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Reply
  • balearicdynamics
    balearicdynamics over 8 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    If we rent, start a project and then are forced to keep renting to the

    same company in order to finish the project, sorry but that is not fair.

    (In this part of the world mortgages/loans can be moved from one bank to

    another, if they could not be moved would empower a bank to rise the

    values and squeeze a poor man to the last cent). I don't know how to

    explain my point any better than this sorry, and this is my main

    objection to this compulsory subscription

    scheme.

    I sadly agree.

    In 2015 I got a 1 year free license from Element14 as part of the PiIoT Challenge kit, so I unexpectedly experienced the period renting product. During this licensing period I moved from version 6.x to 7 and all was fine. Then I decided to buy a 7 unlimited license but almost in the same period I starting reading the news about the Eagle products acquired by Autodesk so I wait. At the actual date, unfortunately I have stopped this move, jut for the cost respect the projects (some also commercial ones) I am working on.

     

    Indeed the guts of the file format is not really interesting for me to

    understand, sorry. Same applies to the .dwg files of autocad I have no

    interest also however they flawlessly work in nano-CAD, Draftsight,

    Rhinoceros etc.

     

    The way to port is something I am thinking too, as you can imagine. At the moment the only possible solution I see is through the Gerber export process, a format that can be imported in some other electronic CAD products.

     

    It is clear that the decision was taken and Autodesk is going to stick to it

    so all I can say is that we will keep using ver 7.7 and will move to

    KiCad (or else) on

    the next big project that justifies the effort of moving.

     

    I have tried to understand what can be the reason of this apparently illogic move.

    The only reason I can see is that after Autodesk put his hands on the Eagle package has already internally decided that the small and personal users are no longer interesting for the business model of the company. As a matter of fact the Autodesk business model applied to Eagle is something starting a process of natural selection, orienting the product to their core business without the need to explicitly declare this traumatic (for small users and small companies) decision as well sounds acceptable and reasonable for big customers.

     

    Enrico

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
Children
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 8 years ago in reply to balearicdynamics

    Enrico Miglino schrieb:

     

    The way to port is something I am thinking too, as you can imagine.

    At the moment the only possible solution I see is through the Gerber

    export process, a format that can be imported in some other

    electronic CAD products.

    Apparently someone provided a way to port EAGLE designs to KiCad:

    <http://hackaday.com/2015/12/27/eagle-to-kicad-made-easy/>

     

    Tilmann

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +2 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • balearicdynamics
    balearicdynamics over 8 years ago in reply to autodeskguest

    Hi Tilmann,

    good suggestion, I was searching but I have not yet found this. I was thinking to something wider than kikad but reading the article it is anyway a good starting point.

     

    Enrico

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube