i think the whole hype about Rpi being the big bad educational tool was nothing more than a pr stunt to get it selling quick, and that is just what happened. i also remember hearing somthing about this being developed by employees of broadcom, when it was first released the soc data sheet required a nondisclosure agreement, so right out of the gate there were problems calling it open source.
i'm sorry if i dont get the idea about teaching computer science with an embeded linux board. don't comp sci cources use full-blown computers already? and if you really want to learn about how computers work, it is much better to start with an 8051 or 8088 and assembly.
but now it seems the more i read, the more i can't suggest the pi for any use other than a media center.
but now it seems the more i read, the more i can't suggest the pi for any use other than a media center.
Professionals who are aware of the relevant FCC regulations shouldn't be suggesting the Pi for use in any residential application in FCC jurisdiction anyway, since the device does not have FCC certification for residential use. That would be a Class B certification, and it doesn't have one at the present date.
I doubt that anyone would deny that media centres constitute an overwhelmingly residential or domestic use of a digital device. It's probably as close to being a poster child for residential use as one could find anywhere.
Morgaine, i agree with its unsuitability because of sub par hardware and or design. however in a properly shielded and fire proof box it would be a wonderfull media center.
From what I hear, Pi does indeed make an exceedingly good media centre. It's just unfortunate that most of the media centre consumers live in nations that have strong residential equipment certification laws, and Class B (residential) certification is one bullet point that the Pi doesn't offer.
Morgaine, i agree with its unsuitability because of sub par hardware and or design. however in a properly shielded and fire proof box it would be a wonderfull media center.
For our part here on Element14, all the credit clearly has to go to yourself for nailing this issue near the beginning of Pi time and persevering with it until today. It was only extremely recently that I finally picked up on your FCC links in detail, and was amazed by what I read there.
If Element14 had paid attention to your postings on the subject last year, they wouldn't be in this risky situation they are in today.
perhaps the problems with certification was engineered into the Rpi to prevent it from being used as an OEM part of a finished comercial product. keeping it in the educational or maker spaces.
