element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
    About the element14 Community
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      •  Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Raspberry Pi
  • Products
  • More
Raspberry Pi
Raspberry Pi Forum very basic cable question
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Quiz
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Raspberry Pi to participate - click to join for free!
Featured Articles
Announcing Pi
Technical Specifications
Raspberry Pi FAQs
Win a Pi
Raspberry Pi Wishlist
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • State Suggested Answer
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 707 subscribers
  • Views 1110 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • raspberry_pi_getting_started
Related

very basic cable question

beaglejax
beaglejax over 10 years ago

Looking at building my own Ethernet cables. Reading a bunch of stuff about pairs and pins, it seems like if you just make sure that the wire at one end is wired to the same pin on the other end, everything will be OK no matter what color or stripe the wire has. I looked at several prewired cables I already have, and none seem to conform to the 568A or B standards. Am I missing something here or can I just wire the pairs through to the matching pinouts?

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    0 johnbeetem over 10 years ago

    The colors don't matter electrically, but using the standard colors might reduce errors.  Make sure you wire the pairs correctly and that you don't exchange the wires of a pair.  Pins 1+2 are a pair, as are 3+6, 4+5, and 7+8.

     

    Here's a Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_physical_layer#Twisted-pair_cable

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • beaglejax
    0 beaglejax over 10 years ago in reply to johnbeetem

    Thanks, John. I have been reading several wiki pages about the topic, and my brain hurts! I guess I'm wondering if T568A or B wiring is best? As I read it, B is compatible with older telco standards, but A is required by the Fed for some reason. I think the most important thing is to keep the cable straight through, keep the wires connected to the same pins. image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    0 johnbeetem over 10 years ago in reply to beaglejax

    The standards are much more important when wiring inside the walls of a building or wiring to a building.  In that case, you really want to use a standard so you can get the wiring right the first time and your installers don't have to think about it.

     

    If you are making cables for connecting devices together and not going through walls, which standard you use isn't so important.  Just wire the cable straight through as you have said, and make sure 1+2, 3+6, 4+5, and 7+8 are paired since they carry differential signals.  10baseT and 100baseT only use 1+2 and 3+6.  1000baseT uses all four pairs.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Reject Answer
    • Cancel
  • beaglejax
    0 beaglejax over 10 years ago in reply to johnbeetem

    After doing some more research, I'm wondering why the 3+6 pairing; does the extra twist give some noise or crosstalk cancellation? I also notice that the sequence goes from stripe -solid to solid -stripe then back to stripe -solid through here and am trying to understand how the wires revolve back into their pair packages going back into the cable. Once they're back in the jacket, it's all CatX. Just trying to also understand the differences between Cat5x and Cat6x, reading there's also Cat8 stuff out there!

     

    I'm also concerned about the usability of cables, as Cat6 seems so stiff that it would only be useful in long runs, and Cat5 could be used in The Last 10 Feet. I can't imagine how stiff a Cat8 cable might be; it seems coax would be more flexible.

     

    Thanks for your insights. I'm also looking at PoE...

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • johnbeetem
    0 johnbeetem over 10 years ago in reply to beaglejax

    Lee Schulz wrote:

     

    After doing some more research, I'm wondering why the 3+6 pairing; does the extra twist give some noise or crosstalk cancellation? I also notice that the sequence goes from stripe -solid to solid -stripe then back to stripe -solid through here and am trying to understand how the wires revolve back into their pair packages going back into the cable. Once they're back in the jacket, it's all CatX. Just trying to also understand the differences between Cat5x and Cat6x, reading there's also Cat8 stuff out there!

    I'm not sure about this, but I think the 3+6 pairing is backward compatibility to telephones.

     

    Take a look at the RJ-45 wiring diagram at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet_physical_layer#Twisted-pair_cable

     

    The middle two wires 4+5 can be used for a standard telephone line, which only has two wires Tip and Ring.  RJ-11 telephone connectors use the middle two pins for Tip and Ring.  The next outer two wires can be used for a second telephone line with its own twisted pair.  They were also used for low-voltage AC to light up a Princess Phone.  The four middle pins of a telephone connector map to the middle four pins (3-6) of the RJ-45.

     

    So here's the deal.  You can run 8-wire (4-pair) cables around your building and use 4+5 for telephones and 1+2 plus 3+6 for 10baseT or 100baseT Ethernet.  In fact, you can get by with just 6 wires if all you need is 10/100baseT, or leave the extra pair 7+8 as a spare.

     

    I'm not that familiar with Cat5/6/8 standards.  Basically, with a higher Cat number you can go longer distances at higher bit rates.  I have a DSL uplink so there's really no need for me to go faster than 100baseT, so Cat5 is fine for me.  If you want 1000baseT, you may need better cable.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • uscdadnyc
    0 uscdadnyc over 10 years ago

    Are you terminating the CAT# cable w/ RJ-45 Plugs? Doable, w/ an RJ-45 Crimping Tool. But why Bother? I think if your are running your CAT# Cables thru Walls (and such) terminate the Ends in an RJ-45 Socket. A "Dog-House" as old TELCO people called it. Stuff is available everywhere (including Home Depot). These also come w/ a "simple" Punch-down Tool. which to pierce the insulation and secure the wires on the "110 Block" (another TELCO Term). Of course w/ every additional Junction (male-to-female) who are introducing possible Failure Points. But a Cost Benefit Analysis might "tip" the Scales toward using said "Dog-Houses".

    (from NY NY USA)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • uscdadnyc
    0 uscdadnyc over 10 years ago

    BTW there are Color Codes as to what color-wire to put on what "110" IDC (Insulation Displacement Connection). Again this is all USA TELCO Stuff. BUT if you are Consistent on which (color) wire goes on which termination, it will be like Hillary said at earlier US House (of Reps) Benghazi Hearings: "What Does It Matter? What Does it Matter?". Just be consistent. But in the Future when/if someone else will be supporting your Work, That person may curse you b/c you did NOT follow Standards. It is up to you. But my motto in situations like this is: "Go Along . Get Along"

    (from NY NY USA)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • beaglejax
    0 beaglejax over 10 years ago in reply to uscdadnyc

    Thank you both, John and Edward.

     

    John, you're right; I should have realized it was a Telco compat thing. I have a microwave link for my ISP, but Gb network is probably overkill for me, too. But I have a box of Cat6, so that's what I'll be using. I'm such a NooB, I'm making cables with EZ-RJ45's. (Wiki says they should be called 8p8c's, looking into that, too.)

     

    Edward, I'm just doing a home installation of a few cameras right now. I have no Closet, although that may be a real consideration in the future. I have worked with 66 and 110 blocks before, but just as a wiring monkey. I certainly cursed when finding miswired blocks which usually caused the problem.

     

    My plan right now is to hook up a couple of weather cams, but as I learn more, I can see a Data Closet in the future... in the meantime, I just want to get the basic structure scalable as the project expands. Thank you both, again! ::thumbs::

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • uscdadnyc
    0 uscdadnyc over 10 years ago in reply to beaglejax

    WRT Cams/Cameras, I would go w/ a WiFi Cam/Camera(s) Rather than Hard-wired Cat# wiring. Reason being more flexibility. All you need is an 110V AC Source nearby. Check-out the "Cloud Cameras" at dlink.com(?). there are also other manufacturers.

    (NYC NY USA)

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
  • beaglejax
    0 beaglejax over 10 years ago in reply to uscdadnyc

    I'm not sure what "WRT Cams/Cameras" are, but I'm looking to install two very different cameras. They both will be outdoors, so 110ac ain't happening. Low volt will have to do, so PoE seems a good choice. I'm also not wanting to go cloud right now, just wanting to save locally. As you can see, this project has many tentacles to be considered, and I was looking to get data back to a server on clean lines that could also supply PoE to them. One camera is the RaspiCam because I like tinkering with stuff. The other is a Hikvision 2032-I. Yes, I had to tinker with it, too. lol

     

    I think the camera topic deserves a new thread. Sorry to wobble off........... image

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Verify Answer
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube