element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
RoadTests & Reviews
  • Products
  • More
RoadTests & Reviews
RoadTest Forum Seeking Feedback -- Would You Be interested in Roadtesting a Bluetooth®︎5-capable Dev Board?
  • Blogs
  • RoadTest Forum
  • Documents
  • RoadTests
  • Reviews
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join RoadTests & Reviews to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 18 replies
  • Subscribers 2559 subscribers
  • Views 2860 views
  • Users 0 members are here
  • roadtester survey
Related

Seeking Feedback -- Would You Be interested in Roadtesting a Bluetooth®︎5-capable Dev Board?

rscasny
rscasny over 1 year ago

imageI am planning on running a roadtest on the following rapid development board for battery-optimized Bluetooth® 5 solutions with the MAX32666 Arm® Cortex®-M4 processor with FPU. The board also has a 6-axis accelerometer/gyro, RGB indicator LED, and pushbutton.

If you have the time, I'd appreciate you voting in the poll below. It helps me gauge interest and the number of kits needed.

Here is some documentation on the board:

MFR page: 
Datasheet: 
Video 

For More Info

RoadTester Poll

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel

Top Replies

  • misaz
    misaz over 1 year ago +3
    I used several similar boards from Maxim (ADI). They are good but Maxim MCUs are not easiest to develop on. Some their FTHR boards have unique peripherals like microphone, audio codec, flash memory, advanced…
  • rscasny
    rscasny over 1 year ago +2
    I'd like to thank everyone who voted. With all your help, I think this poll will be more helpful in my talks with the sponsor than simply a poll asking are you interested or not. Clearly, the interest…
  • hlipka
    hlipka over 1 year ago in reply to robogary +2
    I think such tests are more a review of the eco-system (compiler, IDE, libraries) than of the board itself. There might be one outstanding criteria (e.g. really low power, high performance, many GPIOs…
  • robogary
    robogary over 1 year ago

    Not intending to sound disrespectful or demeaning, but this is board is kinda interesting due to small size and battery optimization, but otherwise just seems another CPU packaged with a couple sensors and LEDs. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • cstanton
    cstanton over 1 year ago in reply to robogary
    robogary said:
    just seems another CPU package

    I will candidly admit, we ask ourselves this a lot and it has been a challenge for the past ten or so years.

    "This is a processor with some connectivity, what difference is it to... this other one?"

    Perhaps that's part of the roadtest.

    Though, frankly I've just seen this has an accelerometer/gyro on it. That always catches my interest. 

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • dougw
    dougw over 1 year ago

    It is a powerful MCU in a small form factor with BT5 and some sensors. I think are tons of uses for such a module and that makes it attractive to road test and have in your tool box, and the price is right.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • misaz
    misaz over 1 year ago

    I used several similar boards from Maxim (ADI). They are good but Maxim MCUs are not easiest to develop on. Some their FTHR boards have unique peripherals like microphone, audio codec, flash memory, advanced ADC, and so on. Often they contains tons of other interesting chips from Maxim (ADI). MAX32666FTHR has IMU, but it's main feature is BLE directly driven from maxim MCU, I think. On some older FTHR board, BLE is achieved by external modules.

    It is the same board which you gave to randomly selected winners of IO-Link quiz. Gough Lui  and dang74  wrote about it very interesting blogs (which both are in scope of RoadTest review):

     Surprise Delivery: Maxim Integrated/ADI MAX32666FTHR Application Platform Unboxing 

     The MAX32666FTHR and My Introduction to Bluetooth 

    I did not win it, but I have some other similar FTHR boards. Here are some my projects and blogs in which I used Maxim FTHR boards:

    MAX78000FTHR:  Blog #14: Gesture Controlled Pacman 

    MAX32620FTHR:  Blog #7: Debugging Maxim’s Firmware Framework Crash

    MAX32655FTHR:  Mini Solar Powered Wireless Temperature Sensor 

    Depending on free time, I am interesting in RoadTesting MAX32666FTHR or other FTHRs which I do not have yet.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +3 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • embeddedguy
    embeddedguy over 1 year ago

    Yes, a good device it is.

    In Bluetooth, I think that Bluetooth SIG has already released standard 5.4. The bluetooth5 itself has several new features included than from previous one(Bluetooth 4). One of them is that it is capable of direction finding. There are basically two methods for direction finding AOA and AOD. Both require special antenna design requirements to be more accurate.

    This board in my understanding is similar to the one from SILabs that has EFR32 microcontrollers.

    www.silabs.com/.../thunderboard-gg12-kit

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • BigG
    BigG over 1 year ago

    Was checking specs... it has a Dual Arm Cortex-M4F. Awesome. It also has 3 x QSPI! Now that's interesting.

    The catch with a previous BLE enabled board (MAX32630FTHR) of theirs was that it used a separate BLE module (PAN1326B), which was not easy to get working. In this case it looks like the BLE radio is integrated.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • dougw
    dougw over 1 year ago in reply to embeddedguy

    It would be interesting to see someone blog about using BT5 in a direction-finding application.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • misaz
    misaz over 1 year ago in reply to dougw

    Very hard to implement with Maxim MCU according to my experience. Open source BLE stack which they provide has very limited support for advanced features. Last year, they even removed text "supporting LE Audio, angle of arrival (AoA), and angle of departure (AoD) for direction finding" from MAX32655 datasheet (document rev. 2 has it, rev. 3 has not).

    I recommed setting goals lower. Working with such open-source stack is very hard and you will be happy when implementing basic GATT in less than 3 workdays (except running basic examples, of course). The minimalistics example has over 1700 lines of codes in multiple files, and it runs only basic build-in services.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up +1 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • iker46
    iker46 over 1 year ago

    I don't have a use for it. I have another board for Maxim and I've never done anything with it...

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • anniel747
    anniel747 over 1 year ago

    Other: No free time far all the paperwork.

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
>
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2025 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

ICP 备案号 10220084.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube