Where is my lbr file?

Am 11.07.2014 04:21, schrieb Elmo Clarity:

I'm new to Eagle and trying to use it for some projects I am working

on.  I started a personal library, but I can't seem to find the actual

file it is in.  I can see it in the Open dialog in Eagle, but it is not

visible in Windows Explorer.  The file is present because if I try to

create a new file in the library directory by that name, it reports a

file already exists.  The thing I don't understand is the lock image on

the file.  I attached a screenshot and marked two of these directories.

One of them is an old install of Eagle.  What is going on with this?

 

 

 

--

To view any images and attachments in this post, visit:

http://www.element14.com/community/message/120013

 

I do not see your image, but assume that you are working with

Windows 7/8/8.1.

The User rights manangement puts all your data into a roaming

folder. This could be something like, C:\users\your_

name_\Appdata\Roaming\Local\CadSoft\Eagle\.......

Windows Explorer does not show these folders by default!

Hope this helps.

BTW: If you would install EAGLE not in the C\program files folder

it would be less complicated to find such files. Then they would

stored in the given EAGLE folders.

--

Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best regards

Richard Hammerl

  CadSoft Support -- hotline@cadsoft.de

  FAQ: http://www.cadsoft.de/training/faq/

On 2014-07-23 09:32, Richard Hammerl wrote:

Am 11.07.2014 04:21, schrieb Elmo Clarity:

BTW: If you would install EAGLE not in the C\program files folder

it would be less complicated to find such files. Then they would

stored in the given EAGLE folders.

 

Reading such bullshit, I start to vomit. Guys! You can't be serious,

writing such nonsense!

It shows great ignorance of the ways programs should be written under

Windows. Data like libraries and design files clearly do not belong in

the "C:\Program Files" or "C:\Program Files (x86)" folders. This is a

very well known fact, Cadsoft chooses to ignore for so many years. And

suggesting to install a program into the root folder is really stupid at

all. It has absolutely nothing to do there. No one would ever come up

with such an idea on a Linux system. So why always try that under Windows?

Carsten

On 26/07/14 11:27, Carsten Wille wrote:

It shows great ignorance of the ways programs should be written under

Windows. Data like libraries and design files clearly do not belong in

the "C:\Program Files" or "C:\Program Files (x86)" folders. This is a

very well known fact, Cadsoft chooses to ignore for so many years. And

suggesting to install a program into the root folder is really stupid at

all. It has absolutely nothing to do there. No one would ever come up

with such an idea on a Linux system. So why always try that under Windows?

All of which has a grain of truth and would be a reasonable argument

(were it not clearly in the form of a flaming rant!) except for two things.

The catastrophically stupid habit of putting program data in a

subdirectory of "Program Files" was actually a Microsoft recommended

practice on Win95.

The apparently preferred alternative location, "Program Data", is also

subject to Microsoft's "let's make everything madly confusing,

impossible to find and even harder to control" folder virtualisation.

On 26/07/14 11:27, Carsten Wille wrote:

It shows great ignorance of the ways programs should be written under

Windows. Data like libraries and design files clearly do not belong in

the "C:\Program Files" or "C:\Program Files (x86)" folders. This is a

very well known fact, Cadsoft chooses to ignore for so many years. And

suggesting to install a program into the root folder is really stupid at

all. It has absolutely nothing to do there. No one would ever come up

with such an idea on a Linux system. So why always try that under Windows?

All of which has a grain of truth and would be a reasonable argument

(were it not clearly in the form of a flaming rant!) except for two things.

The catastrophically stupid habit of putting program data in a

subdirectory of "Program Files" was actually a Microsoft recommended

practice on Win95.

The apparently preferred alternative location, "Program Data", is also

subject to Microsoft's "let's make everything madly confusing,

impossible to find and even harder to control" folder virtualisation.

Hello Rob Pearce !:

....

The catastrophically stupid habit of putting program data in a

subdirectory of "Program Files" was actually a Microsoft recommended

practice on Win95.

 

The apparently preferred alternative location, "Program Data", is also

subject to Microsoft's "let's make everything madly confusing,

impossible to find and even harder to control" folder virtualisation.

Each Windows user which has a brain - will install nothing important on

a system partition !!! Programs and data as well. In case of partition

recovery need (MS Windows common sytuation after some time !!!) all this

important programs/data will be destroyed !

My personal recomendation is :

One partition for system

Another partition for programs,and maybe data - as in Eagle

And other one for data ...

But anybody can install as wanted. In any case the worst option is the

MS recomendation - all in one system partition ...

regards

--

Grzegorz Zalot

complex ltd.

office tel/fax : +48 32 2505840

mobil : +48 501 301515