element14 Community
element14 Community
    Register Log In
  • Site
  • Search
  • Log In Register
  • Community Hub
    Community Hub
    • What's New on element14
    • Feedback and Support
    • Benefits of Membership
    • Personal Blogs
    • Members Area
    • Achievement Levels
  • Learn
    Learn
    • Ask an Expert
    • eBooks
    • element14 presents
    • Learning Center
    • Tech Spotlight
    • STEM Academy
    • Webinars, Training and Events
    • Learning Groups
  • Technologies
    Technologies
    • 3D Printing
    • FPGA
    • Industrial Automation
    • Internet of Things
    • Power & Energy
    • Sensors
    • Technology Groups
  • Challenges & Projects
    Challenges & Projects
    • Design Challenges
    • element14 presents Projects
    • Project14
    • Arduino Projects
    • Raspberry Pi Projects
    • Project Groups
  • Products
    Products
    • Arduino
    • Avnet & Tria Boards Community
    • Dev Tools
    • Manufacturers
    • Multicomp Pro
    • Product Groups
    • Raspberry Pi
    • RoadTests & Reviews
  • About Us
    About the element14 Community
  • Store
    Store
    • Visit Your Store
    • Choose another store...
      • Europe
      •  Austria (German)
      •  Belgium (Dutch, French)
      •  Bulgaria (Bulgarian)
      •  Czech Republic (Czech)
      •  Denmark (Danish)
      •  Estonia (Estonian)
      •  Finland (Finnish)
      •  France (French)
      •  Germany (German)
      •  Hungary (Hungarian)
      •  Ireland
      •  Israel
      •  Italy (Italian)
      •  Latvia (Latvian)
      •  
      •  Lithuania (Lithuanian)
      •  Netherlands (Dutch)
      •  Norway (Norwegian)
      •  Poland (Polish)
      •  Portugal (Portuguese)
      •  Romania (Romanian)
      •  Russia (Russian)
      •  Slovakia (Slovak)
      •  Slovenia (Slovenian)
      •  Spain (Spanish)
      •  Sweden (Swedish)
      •  Switzerland(German, French)
      •  Turkey (Turkish)
      •  United Kingdom
      • Asia Pacific
      •  Australia
      •  China
      •  Hong Kong
      •  India
      •  Japan
      •  Korea (Korean)
      •  Malaysia
      •  New Zealand
      •  Philippines
      •  Singapore
      •  Taiwan
      •  Thailand (Thai)
      •  Vietnam
      • Americas
      •  Brazil (Portuguese)
      •  Canada
      •  Mexico (Spanish)
      •  United States
      Can't find the country/region you're looking for? Visit our export site or find a local distributor.
  • Translate
  • Profile
  • Settings
Autodesk EAGLE
  • Products
  • More
Autodesk EAGLE
EAGLE User Support (English) Triac track width and clearance advices?
  • Blog
  • Forum
  • Documents
  • Events
  • Polls
  • Files
  • Members
  • Mentions
  • Sub-Groups
  • Tags
  • More
  • Cancel
  • New
Join Autodesk EAGLE to participate - click to join for free!
Actions
  • Share
  • More
  • Cancel
Forum Thread Details
  • Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 188 subscribers
  • Views 1833 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Related

Triac track width and clearance advices?

autodeskguest
autodeskguest over 17 years ago

Hi,

 

I�m making the layout for a PCB that uses a triac in TO-220 package. The maximum current in the triac (BTA312Y) is 8 Amp. and the copper thickness 35�m (1 oz/ft2). What track width would you recommend? I�ve seen calculators on the Internet but they ask the allowable temperature rise and I don�t know what value I can choose. On the other hand, I�ve seen that IPC recommends 220mil for 8 Amp., 10�C rise and 1oz/ft2 Cu but it�s very big?

 

What value do you use for track clearance for 220V mains voltages?  I�ve seen 0.75mm (http://www.electronics-project-design.com/PCB-Design.html ) for coated board. But here (http://www.smpspowersupply.com/ipc2221pcbclearance.html ) the values are not the same and I don�t know what to use? Is bare board for PCB without parts on it? So do I have to use assembly and �external components leads, uncoated� if : the board has a solder resist mask, is populated and if there is no coating on component leads?

Is the clearance also needed between the component�s pads (external diameter to external diameter)? If so, is it possible with a standard TO-220 package?

 

 

Thank you.

 

--

Browser access to CadSoft Support Forums at http://www.eaglecentral.ca

 

  • Sign in to reply
  • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    "Hallet" <antoinehallet@yahoo.fr> wrote in message

    news:h4k5pf$h9q$1@cheetah.cadsoft.de...

     

    What value do you use for track clearance for 220V mains voltages?  Ive

    seen 0.75mm (http://www.electronics-project-design.com/PCB-Design.html )

    for coated board. But here

    (http://www.smpspowersupply.com/ipc2221pcbclearance.html ) the values are

    not the same and I dont know what to use? Is bare board for PCB without

    parts on it? So do I have to use assembly and external components leads,

    uncoated if : the board has a solder resist mask, is populated and if

    there is no coating on component leads?

    Is the clearance also needed between the components pads (external

    diameter to external diameter)? If so, is it possible with a standard

    TO-220 package?

     

     

    Take a look at these links:

    http://www.smps.us/pcbtracespacing.html

     

    http://www.pcbwizards.com/faq.htm

     

    Related- you can look for 'creepage and clearance distance'

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    Thank you for your answers.

    @jrafetseder

    It's a special manufacturing process, it's not a standard technology. For just some board it would cost a lot.

     

    I have tried to bend the triac leads (like some TO-92) in order to respect the 1.5mm clearance, but I think the leads are too small to go trough the PCB. The clearance should be 1.50mm from 301 to 500 AC peak and 0.75mm from 251 to 300 AC peak, so if I have a little less than 1.5mm I suppose it's not a big problem... The TO220 package doesn't seem to be well designed to respect the IPC clearance. 

     

     

    Can I use a track of 2.54mm wide (small length) to connect to a wider track or polygon?

     

    Thank you.

    --

    Browser access to CadSoft Support Forums at http://www.eaglecentral.ca

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    a track larger than the pad is not a problem, the pad may get somewhat

    hotter than the rest of the track but it's small and attached to a big

    track and big component lead that will be most likely hotter than it is.

      the big track improves heat sinking, this only becomes a drawback if

    it makes soldering the pad difficult, that's why a polygon will generate

    a thermal isolation around the pad.

     

    an 8 amp triac when on will generate about 8 watts, that's a big waste,

    consider using some arrangements of low Ron MOSFETS or optical relays to

    perform the same task with /way/ less heat. triacs also trigger

    unpredictably on inductive line transients, in my experience. you need

    to test for this, a good test is to plug in a vacuum cleaner on same

    outlet as the DUT and turn it off and see if you don't get transient

    conduction in the triac, bet you will image

     

    the covered and uncovered specs for track temperature rise refer to the

    presence of solder mask which increases heat rise in a trace.

     

    as for isolation, at atmospheric pressure, you don't need much, at low

    pressures, 5V will produce corona discharge. route your 220V traces with

    user safety (fingers, tools, scope probes) in mind. i would make them

    covered with solder mask. to find the minimum clearance, you need to

    look up the dielectric strength of air at your ambient temp and

    pressure. use the peak voltage of the AC wave. you shouldn't have any

    trouble giving yourself a generous safety factor at normal air pressures.

     

    that enough advice for ya? image

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • e14 Contributor
    e14 Contributor over 17 years ago

    take a look at this:

    http://www.haeusermann.at/2,product/14,HSMtec/15,Hochstrom--und-Waermemanagement-auf-der-Leiterplatte

     

    if it's in german, an english version is available

    r

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    Hallet wrote:

    Hi,

     

    Im making the layout for a PCB that uses a triac in TO-220 package.

    The maximum current in the triac (BTA312Y) is 8 Amp. and the copper

    thickness 35m (1 oz/ft^2). What track width would you recommend? Ive

    seen calculators on the Internet but they ask the allowable

    temperature rise and I dont know what value I can choose. On the

    other hand, Ive seen that IPC recommends 220mil for 8 Amp., 10C rise

    and 1oz/ft^2 Cu but its very big?

     

    Well, 8A is a lot of current, so it will require a pretty fat trace.  For

    temperature rise, what can you tolerate?  If you have a "nice" ambient

    environment of, say, 25C, then you might consider a greater PCB trace

    temperature rise.  If you allow a 30C temperature rise, then the PCB tracks

    near your TRIAC might rise to a temperature of 25C + 30C = 55C.  If your

    TRIAC is mounted to the PCB, then its case may also be at 55C (though you

    probably have a big heat sink), so you'll have to consider that in your

    calculation of junction temperature in the TRIAC.

     

    At a 30C temperature rise, you only need about a 100mil track to carry 8A.

     

    If you can use 2oz copper instead of 1oz, then you can halve the track width

    again.

     

    I would use as much copper as possible for conducting the current.  I

    generally use polygons to make use of all available space for carrying big

    currents -- more copper is better.

     

    What value do you use for track clearance for 220V mains voltages? Ive

    seen 0.75mm

    (http://www.electronics-project-design.com/PCB-Design.html ) for

    coated board. But here

    (http://www.smpspowersupply.com/ipc2221pcbclearance.html ) the values

    are not the same and I dont know what to use? Is bare board for PCB

    without parts on it? So do I have to use assembly and external

    components leads, uncoated if : the board has a solder resist mask,

    is populated and if there is no coating on component leads? Is the

    clearance also needed between the components pads (external diameter

    to external diameter)? If so, is it possible with a standard TO-220

    package?

     

    Sorry, little experience with 220V clearance requirements.  Maybe somebody

    else will comment?

     

    --

    Bert Menkveld

     

     

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    If your application has to work in low air pressure, such as in

    aviation, then the clearance specs require much wider spacing.  Low

    pressure air arcs over much easier than normal pressure air.

     

     

    Robert Scott

    Real-Time Specialties

    Ypsilanti, Michigan

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
  • autodeskguest
    autodeskguest over 17 years ago

    Anybody has some advices?

     

    Thank you.

    --

    Browser access to CadSoft Support Forums at http://www.eaglecentral.ca

     

    • Cancel
    • Vote Up 0 Vote Down
    • Sign in to reply
    • Cancel
element14 Community

element14 is the first online community specifically for engineers. Connect with your peers and get expert answers to your questions.

  • Members
  • Learn
  • Technologies
  • Challenges & Projects
  • Products
  • Store
  • About Us
  • Feedback & Support
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal and Copyright Notices
  • Sitemap
  • Cookies

An Avnet Company © 2026 Premier Farnell Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Premier Farnell Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no 00876412), registered office: Farnell House, Forge Lane, Leeds LS12 2NE.

Follow element14

  • X
  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • YouTube