Actions
Engagement
  • Author Author: Jan Cumps
  • Date Created: Date Created
  • Last Updated Last Updated:
  • Views 8708 views
  • Likes 8 likes
  • Comments 107 comments
Related
Recommended

Programmable Electronic Load - Analyse the Summing Node Zero Point

This blog documents investigates the feedback node of the electronic load that , and are designing.

It's an important spot in the load's design. It measures the set point and the feedback from the output.

When the output is driven to 0, it should be on a potential as close as possible to 0 V.

On the first prototype it's -0.2 V. Not so much off, but the negative value  influences our ADC measurements.

This document checks how we can get this node to 0 V.

image

 

Because this document is evolving, some comments below may be out of sync with the content. That's because the content is adapted based on the conversation.

The measurements taken here are based on the original design, without R32 in place and U3B + tied to ground.

The current sense side of R7 is connected to ground, and a variable negative voltage from 0 V down is applied to the current sense side of R8 to simulate current being sensed.

 

The circuit isn't complex. The set point is driven by a DAC. It's set to 0 for this test.

The second input to this node is OpAmp 3C. It has both inputs tied to ground so should theoretically have 0 V at the output.

On my board I measure a potential of -0.212V at the left side of R33.

I hope to get this closer to 0 V to ease the ADC a bit - its performance degrades with negative voltage at its inputs.

Like the other blogs for the electronic load, this is a working document that will be updated with findings from anyone who wants to chime in.

 

Behaviour at 0V

 

buzy image

Parents

  • This is unfair on Peter. It's his design yet you're having all the fun of sorting out the prototype.

     

    But if you're intent on doing this anyway...

     

    "On my board I measure a potential of -0.212V at the left side of R33"

    You need to measure the output of U3B too - it might be lower. The ADC will have some form of ESD protection and that might clamp the voltage. Only way to know is to measure both ends of R33 and see if they are different.

     

    Then you need to measure the output of U3C. You have two amplifiers in series and you need to know how much of a contribution each is making to whatever offset you measure at the output of U3B. That will give you some useful clues as to what is going on.

     

    (As Peter points out the meter input resistance will affect the readings, so start with measuring the outputs of the amplifiers because they are the lowest impedance points in the circuit and your meter has the least effect on them - the output impedance will be under a hundred ohms.)

  • in reply to jc2048

      wrote:

     

    "On my board I measure a potential of -0.212V at the left side of R33"

    You need to measure the output of U3B too - it might be lower. The ADC will have some form of ESD protection and that might clamp the voltage. Only way to know is to measure both ends of R33 and see if they are different.

     

    Then you need to measure the output of U3C. You have two amplifiers in series and you need to know how much of a contribution each is making to whatever offset you measure at the output of U3B. That will give you some useful clues as to what is going on.

     

    image

  • in reply to Jan Cumps

    Love the advertisement for "John's excellent probes". It's like one those things from the old days of American TV where the presenter would suddenly turn, look very earnestly at the camera, and start reading out the advert. Perhaps we could see if John would like to sponsor this episode of Circuit Conundrums (starring Jan Cumps as The Man with the Meter).

     

    The interesting figure is the 0.104V at the summing node. If there was only R2 and R4 in circuit, that voltage could only be 0.054V (give or take a little for the resistor tolerance). The fact that it's so high suggests that there's an additional contribution to the current through R2 from what's connected beyond the dotted line.

     

    The second clue is U3B. The op-amp is doing a good job of keeping the virtual earth at pin 6 close to GND, yet it has to position the output at -0.212V to do it (and not the -0.108V you would expect given the 0.108V at the output of U3C).

     

    What do they both suggest?

Comment
  • in reply to Jan Cumps

    Love the advertisement for "John's excellent probes". It's like one those things from the old days of American TV where the presenter would suddenly turn, look very earnestly at the camera, and start reading out the advert. Perhaps we could see if John would like to sponsor this episode of Circuit Conundrums (starring Jan Cumps as The Man with the Meter).

     

    The interesting figure is the 0.104V at the summing node. If there was only R2 and R4 in circuit, that voltage could only be 0.054V (give or take a little for the resistor tolerance). The fact that it's so high suggests that there's an additional contribution to the current through R2 from what's connected beyond the dotted line.

     

    The second clue is U3B. The op-amp is doing a good job of keeping the virtual earth at pin 6 close to GND, yet it has to position the output at -0.212V to do it (and not the -0.108V you would expect given the 0.108V at the output of U3C).

     

    What do they both suggest?

Children
No Data